期刊文献+

微生物发酵对豆粕抗原性的影响 被引量:14

Effect of microbial fermentation on the antigenicity of soybean meal
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 探讨了微生物发酵对豆粕抗原性的影响。选用植物乳杆菌、干酪乳杆菌、枯草芽孢杆菌、地衣芽孢杆菌和米曲霉这5种菌株,在液态和固态条件下分别发酵豆粕12 h,对发酵产物进行抗原性测定。结果表明:豆粕经这5种菌株发酵后,粗蛋白含量均有所提高,其中枯草芽孢杆菌在固态发酵时降解豆粕抗原蛋白和降低豆粕抗原性的效果优于其它菌株,此时,豆粕蛋白水解度为4.89%,必需氨基酸含量为193.51mg/g。SDS-PAGE显示发酵豆粕中β-伴大豆球蛋白的α’和α亚基消失,β亚基条带和大豆球蛋白的酸性亚基条带密度减弱,同时大豆球蛋白与β-伴大豆球蛋白的抗原性降低率分别为20.62%和50.12%。 The effect of microbial fermentation on the antigenicity of soybean meal was studied. Five strains, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis and Aspergillus oryzae, were selected to ferment soybean meal for 12 h under liquid and solid conditions, respectively, and then the fermentation products were determined. The results showed that the crude protein content of soybean meal was increased after fermentation by these five strains, and Bacillus subtilis was better than other strains in degrading soybean meal antigen protein and decreasing antigenicity in solid-state fermentation, and the degree of hydrolysis was 4.89 % and the content of essential amino acids was about 193.51 mg/g. SDS-PAGE showed that the α’ and α subunits of β-conglycinin were disappeared, β-subunit and the acid subunits of glycinin were decreased in soybean meal. At this time, the antigenicity of soybean glycinin and β-conglycinin decreased by 20.62% and 50.12%, respectively.
作者 杨慧 曲也直 刘显琦 武俊瑞 YANG Hui;QU Ye-zhi;LIU Xian-qi;WU Jun-rui(Food Science College,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110000,Liaoning,China)
出处 《粮食与油脂》 北大核心 2020年第5期51-55,共5页 Cereals & Oils
关键词 豆粕 微生物发酵 抗原性 抗原蛋白 soybean meal microbial fermentation antigenicity antigen protein
作者简介 杨慧(1986-),女,讲师,研究方向食品生物技术;通信作者:武俊瑞(1977-),男,副教授,研究方向食品生物技术。
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献39

  • 1刘海燕,邱玉朗,魏炳栋,闫晓刚,于维,陈群.微生物发酵豆粕研究进展[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(1):35-40. 被引量:35
  • 2周红蕾,李春玲,王贵平,侯加法.大豆中抗营养因子及其去除方法概述[J].饲料工业,2006,27(3):23-26. 被引量:45
  • 3Cabrera-Orozco A, Jimenez-Martinez C, Davila-Ortiz G. Soybean: non-nutritional factors and their biological functionality[M]. IN- TECH Open Access Publisher, 2013.
  • 4Hancock J D, Cao H, Kim I H. Effects of processing technologies and genetic modifications on nutritional value of full-fat soybeans in pigs[J] Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2000, 13: 356-365.
  • 5Friedman M,Brandon D L.Nutritional and health benefits of soy proteins[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2001:49(3): 1 069-1 086.
  • 6Smith A J. Pouhry: The Tropical Agriculturalist, Revised Edition [M], CTA/Macmillan Publishing Company, 2001.
  • 7Maidala A, Udoma U D, Egbo L M. Effects of different processing methods on the chemical composition and antinutritional factors of soybean glycine max (L.) merrill[J]. Pakistani Journal of Nutri- tion, 2013, 12(12): 1 057-1 060.
  • 8Li S, Zhu D, Li K, et al, Soybean curd residue: composition, utili- zation, and related limiting factors[J]. International Scholarly Re- search Notices Industrial Engineering, 2013(9): 1-8.
  • 9Dourado L R B, Biagiotti D,. Costa F G P, et al. Soybeans (Glycine max) and soybean products in poultry and swine nutrition[M]. IN- TECH Open Access Publisher, 2011.
  • 10Lavelle E C, Grant G, Pusztai A, et al. Mucosal immunogenicity of plant lectins in mice[J]. Immunology, 2000, 99( 1 ): 30-37.

共引文献22

同被引文献227

引证文献14

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部