期刊文献+

ARDS患者功能残气量与跨肺压的相关性以及二者对预后的预测价值研究 被引量:14

Correlation between functional residual capacity and trans-pulmonary pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients and their prognostic value
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析基于功能残气量(FRC)指导最佳呼气末正压(PEEP)在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者肺复张过程中的应用,探讨FRC与跨肺压的相关性以及二者对预后的预测价值。方法:选择2018年3月至2019年5月锦州医科大学附属第一医院重症医学科收治的78例ARDS机械通气患者,并按随机数字表法分为试验组(41例)和对照组(37例),所有患者在充分镇静后均予渐进式增加PEEP进行肺复张,其中试验组通过监测FRC设置最佳PEEP,对照组则通过最大氧合法设置最佳PEEP。比较两组肺复张前及肺复张后30 min和2 h动态顺应性(Cdyn)、氧合指数(PaO 2/FiO 2)、机械功(MP)的差异;采用Pearson法分析FRC与跨肺压的相关性;采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评估FRC和跨肺压对ARDS患者28 d病死率的预测价值。结果:试验组肺复张后最佳PEEP为(16.24±1.57)cmH 2O(1 cmH 2O=0.098 kPa),对照组最佳PEEP为(14.11±1.15)cmH 2O,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=5.678,P=0.000)。Pearson相关分析显示,ARDS患者FRC与跨肺压存在显著相关性(r=0.759,P=0.000)。试验组肺复张后30 min和2 h的Cdyn、PaO 2/FiO 2均明显高于对照组〔Cdyn(mL/cmH 2O):61.16±3.55比58.54±5.25,58.59±2.82比56.86±3.40;PaO 2/FiO 2(mmHg,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa):245.27±14.86比239.00±5.34,192.25±5.11比188.86±5.07〕,MP均明显低于对照组(J/min:16.32±1.11比17.05±1.22,15.22±1.25比17.03±1.50),差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,FRC和跨肺压对ARDS患者28 d病死率均有预测价值,其ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.868、0.828(均P<0.01)。结论:ARDS患者在肺复张过程中监测FRC可指导最佳PEEP;FRC与跨肺压具有显著相关性,并且二者对ARDS患者28 d病死率均具有预测价值。 Objective To analyze the application of functional residual capacity(FRC)-guided optimal positive end-expiratory pressure(PEEP)in pulmonary retention in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS),and to explore the correlation between FRC and trans-pulmonary pressure and their predictive value for prognosis.Methods Seventy-eight ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation admitted to department of critical care medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University from March 2018 to May 2019 were enrolled.According to random number table method,the patients were divided into experimental group and the control group.PEEP of all patients were gradually increased in recruitment after fully sedation and analgesia.The best PEEP was set by monitoring FRC in the experimental group,and by monitoring maximum oxygen in the control group set.The differences before and after 30 minutes and 2 hours recruitment manoeuvres in dynamic compliance(Cdyn),oxygenation index(PaO2/FiO2),and mechanical power(MP)were compared between the two groups.Pearson method was used to analyze the correlation between FRC and trans-pulmonary pressure.The predictive value of FRC and trans-pulmonary pressure for 28-day mortality in patients with ARDS was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.Results The optimal PEEP was(16.24±1.57)cmH2O(1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa)in the experimental group and(14.11±1.15)cmH2O in the control group in recruitment maneuvres,with statistically significant difference between the two groups(t=5.678,P=0.000).Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between FRC and trans-pulmonary pressure in ARDS patients(r=0.759,P=0.000).Cdyn and PaO2/FiO2 in the experimental group were higher than the control group at 30 minutes and 2 hours after recruitment maneuvres[Cdyn(mL/cmH2O):61.16±3.55 vs.58.54±5.25,58.59±2.82 vs.56.86±3.40;PaO2/FiO2(mmHg,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa):245.27±14.86 vs.239.00±5.34,192.25±5.11 vs.188.86±5.07],MP was lower than the control group(J/min:16.32±1.11 vs.17.05±1.22,15.22±1.25 vs.17.03±1.50),the difference was statistically significant(all P<0.05).The ROC curve analysis showed that both FRC and trans-pulmonary pressure had predictive value for the 28-day mortality of ARDS patients,and the area under the ROC curve(AUC)was 0.868,and 0.828 respectively(both P<0.01).Conclusions Measuring FRC in patients with ARDS during recruitment maneuvres can guide optimal PEEP.FRC was significantly correlated with trans-pulmonary pressure,and both of them had predictive value for 28-day mortality in ARDS patients.
作者 邸兴伟 李晓东 胡占升 Di Xingwei;Li Xiaodong;Hu Zhansheng(Department of Critical Care Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University,Jinzhou 121000,Liaoning,China)
出处 《中华危重病急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第2期166-170,共5页 Chinese Critical Care Medicine
基金 辽宁省教育厅科技研究项目(JYTFUDF201747) 辽宁省临床重点专科建设项目(2015-111)。
关键词 功能残气量 跨肺压 呼气末正压 肺复张 急性呼吸窘迫综合征 Functional residual capacity Trans-pulmonary pressure Positive end-expiratory pressure Recruitment maneuvres Acute respiratory distress symptoms
作者简介 通信作者:胡占升,Email:ICUHZS@163.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献64

  • 1Wanger J, Clausen JL, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes. Eur Respir J, 2005, 26:511-522.
  • 2Miller MR, Crapo R, Hankinson J, et al. General considerations for lung function testing. Eur Respir J, 2005, 26 : 153-161.
  • 3Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. Interpretive strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J, 2005, 26:948-968.
  • 4MacIntyre N, Crapo RO, Viegi G, et al. Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J, 2005, 26:720-735.
  • 5朱蕾,刘又宁,于润渺/临床肺功能学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.
  • 6Gattinoni L, Pesenti A. The concept of " baby lung " [ J ]. Intensive Care Med,2005,31 (6) :776-784.
  • 7Gattinoni L, Protti A, Caironi P, et al. Ventilator-induced lung injmy: the anatomical and physiological framework [J]. Crit Care Med, 2010,38(10s) :S539-548.
  • 8Protti A, Cressoni M, Santini A, et al. Lung stress and strain during mechanical ventilation: any safe threshold? [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2011,183 (10) : 1354-1362.
  • 9Gattinoni L, Carlesso E, Cadfingher P, et al. Physical and biological triggers of ventilator-induced lung injury and its prevention [ J ]. Eur Respir J,2003,22 ( 9 ) : 15 s-25 s.
  • 10Chiumello D, Carlesso E, Cadringher P, et al. Lung Stress and Strain during Mechanical Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Ned,2008,178(4) : 346- 355.

共引文献124

同被引文献99

引证文献14

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部