摘要
目的:对比传统切开挂线方法与切开挂线对口引流术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的疗效。方法:2015年6月-2018年12月收治高位复杂性肛瘘患者30例,按手术方案分为两组,各15例。对照组实施传统切开挂线手术方案;观察组实施切开挂线对口引流术手术方案。比较两组手术效果。结果:两组治疗总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组创面愈合时间、住院时间均短于对照组,且观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:应用切开挂线对口引流术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘,患者术后恢复周期短、并发症发生率低。
Objective:To compare the curative effect of traditional incision and thread drawing method and incision and thread-drawing drainage in the treatment of high complex anal fistula.Methods:From June 2015 to December 2018,30 patients with high complex anal fistula were selected.According to the operation plan,they were divided into two groups of 15 cases in each.The control group was treated with traditional incision and thread drawing operation,while the observation group was treated with incision and thread-drawing drainage.We compared the results of the two groups.Results:There was no significant difference in total effective rate of treatment between the two groups(P>0.05).In the observation group,the wound healing time and hospitalization time were shorter than those in the control group,and the incidence of complications was lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the treatment of high complex anal fistula with incision and thread-drawing drainage,the recovery period is short and the incidence of complications is low.
作者
马辉
李昆伦
Ma Hui;Li Kunlun(Anorectal Department,the Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Urumqi City,Xinjiang,Urumqi 830000)
出处
《中国社区医师》
2020年第12期62-62,64,共2页
Chinese Community Doctors
关键词
高位复杂性肛瘘
传统切开挂线方法
切开挂线对口引流术
High complex anal fistula
Traditional incision and thread drawing method
Incision and thread-drawing drainage
