期刊文献+

全文本计量分析理论与技术的新进展与新探索——2019全文本文献计量分析学术沙龙综述 被引量:12

New Progress and Exploration of Full-text Bibliometric Analysis Theory and Technology——A Review of the 2019 Academic Salon on Full-text Bibliometric Analysis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在2019年11月10—12日于成都召开的“2019科学计量与科技评价天府国际论坛”上,由章成志等人发起的第二届“全文本文献计量分析”学术沙龙,吸引了百余位专家学者的参与和交流,给参会者留下了深刻的印象。本文通过对沙龙嘉宾的发言和讨论内容进行梳理与总结,将沙龙的主要内容归纳为基于引用行为的学术评价体系、全文本的实体抽取、学术文本关键词自动抽取、新兴研究话题和新兴技术预测、以及全文本数据开放、构建与应用等五个主题,以期揭示国内外全文本文献计量分析在理论与技术方面的最新进展以及发展趋势。 The 2019 Tianfu International Forum of Scientometrics and Evaluation was held in Chengdu on November 10-12,as an important part of the forum,the second"Full-text Bibliometric Analysis"academic salon initiated by Zhang Chengzhi and others has attracted and impressed more than 100 experts and participants.This paper summarized the speeches and discussion of the salon and devided the contents into five themes in order to reveal the latest developments and trends in the theory and technology of full-text bibliometrics analysis at home and abroad.Themes of the salon include academic evaluation system based on citation behavior,entity extraction of full-text,automatic extraction of academic text keywords,emerging research topics and technology predictions,and the access,construction and application of the full-text data.
作者 章成志(报告) 胡志刚(报告) 徐硕(报告) 汪雪锋(报告) 师庆辉(报告) 王巍(报告) 钱佳佳(综述整理) 罗卓然(综述整理) Zhang Chengzhi;Hu Zhigang;Xu Shuo;Wang Xuefeng;Shi Qinghui;Wang Wei;Qian Jiajia;Luo Zhuoran(School of Economics&Management,Nanjing University of Science&Technology,Nanjing 210094;Institute of Science of Science and Science&Technology Management,Dalian University of Technology Dalian 116024;College of Economics and Management,Beijing University of Technology,Beijing 100124;School of Management and Economics,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081;Tongfang Knowledge Network Technology Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100084;Reed Elsevier Information Technology(Beijing)Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100738;School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072;Information Retrieval and Knowledge Mining Laboratory,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072)
出处 《信息资源管理学报》 CSSCI 2020年第1期111-117,共7页 Journal of Information Resources Management
关键词 抽取 实体抽取 新兴话题预测数据开放 Full-text Bibliometrics Citation behavior Sentiment analysis Keyword extraction Entity extraction Prediction of emerging research topics Data open
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献70

  • 1光明日报.一些国家和地区对SCI的态度[N].光明日报,2002,1/18,第B01版.
  • 2王丹红.从统计方法到评价标准的转变[N].科学时报,2001,3/6,第4版.
  • 3蔡睿智.SCI论文不是绝对标准[N].科学时报,2001,8/3.
  • 4MARIA BORDONS, M. T. FERNáNDEZ, ISABEL GóMEZ.Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country[J].Vol..53, No. 2(2002)195-206.
  • 5PETER VINKLER. Subfield problems in applying the Garfield (Impact) Factors in practice[J]. Scientometrics, Vol. 53, No. 2(2002)267 - 279.
  • 6王丹红.从统计方法到评价标准的转变-对SCI在科学评价体系中作用的再思考[N].科学时报,2001,3/6,第4版.
  • 7靳达申.SCI是一种实用的评价标准[N].科学时报,2000-09—25.
  • 8孙亦,徐克敏.勿轻视SCI,勿滥用SCI[N].科学时报:2001-11-29(4)
  • 9叶继元,袁培国,吴向东.引文数据中的负面引用初探[J].新世纪图书馆,2007(6):22-23. 被引量:8
  • 10俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山.学术期刊综合评价数据标准化方法研究[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(12):136-139. 被引量:117

共引文献142

同被引文献253

引证文献12

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部