摘要
作为新时期思想解放的有机部分,朱光潜通过重新阐释恩格斯的"意识形态高浮论",为寻求文学的相对独立性提供了充足的理论依据,改写了文学与政治的关系,将文学为政治服务并依附于政治的命题转换成文学可以独立于政治从而主体地作用于政治的命题。但限于时代语境与个人学术立场的特质,朱光潜未能彻底揭示"经济决定论"的应然论域。"经济决定论"在说明文学性质时,忽略了事物的区别性、作家的主体性与艺术的创造性,所以,可以从经济的角度、政治的角度观察与评价文学活动,却不能由此揭示文学的审美本质。
As an organic part of ideological emancipation in the new era, Zhu Guangqian provides sufficient theoretical basis for seeking the relative independence of literature by reinterpreting Engels’ s "ideology floating theory", rewriting the relationship between literature and politics, transforming the proposition that literature serves politics and depends on politics into that literature can be independent of politics so as to act on politics subjectively. But limited to the context of the times and the characteristics of his own academic position, Zhu Guangqian fails to thoroughly reveal the domain of "economic determinism". In explaining the nature of literature, economic determinism ignores the diversity of things, the subjectivity of writers and the creativity of art. Therefore, we can observe and evaluate literary activities from economic and political perspectives, but we can’t reveal the aesthetic nature of literature.
出处
《上海文化》
CSSCI
2019年第12期27-38,125,126,共14页
Shanghai Culture
基金
国家社科基金项目“新中国文论教材中‘文学定义’研究”（项目号：17BZW054）的阶段性成果
作者简介
刘锋杰,男,1953年生,安徽泾县人。苏州大学文学院教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为文学基本理论、中国现代文论史、张爱玲专题研究。
