期刊文献+

新型螺旋形热膨胀前列腺支架治疗高危良性前列腺增生的疗效分析 被引量:5

Clinical effect of a new spiral thermo-expandable prostatic stent for patients with high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨螺旋形热膨胀前列腺支架(Memokath)治疗高危良性前列腺增生病人的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析南京医科大学附属老年医院2017~2018年间高危良性前列腺增生病人14例,年龄80~94岁,平均(82.0±4.5)岁。所有病人均行局麻下经尿道前列腺支架植入术。分别于术后1、3、6个月,行国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、残余尿量(RUV)检查并进行对比分析。结果所有病人手术均获得成功,术后6个月IPSS评分为(10.54±2.14)分,Qmax为(10.24±3.52)mL/s,RUV为(17.23±8.43)mL。与术前比较,术后IPSS下降,Qmax水平升高,RUV减少,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后出现尿路刺激征2例(14.2%),间断性肉眼血尿2例(14.2%),间断性尿路感染2例(14.2%)。结论采用Memokath支架是一种安全有效的治疗高危老年前列腺增生病人的方法,但其远期效果及其并发症还需进一步观察。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of spiral thermal expansion prostatic stent(Memokath)in the treatment of high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)in the elderly.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 14 cases of aged patients with high-risk BPH from 2017 to 2018 in Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University.All patients aged 80-94 years,with an average age of 82.0±4.5 years.All patients underwent the operations under local anesthesia.International prostate symptom score(IPSS),maximum urine flow rate(Qmax)and residual urine volume(RUV)were examined and compared 1,3 and 6 months after surgery respectively.Results The operation was successful in all the patients.Compared with those before operation,the score of IPSS decreased,the level Qmax increased and RUV decreased after operation,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The incidence rates of urinary tract irritation,intermittent gross hematuria and urinary tract infection was 14.2%,14.2%,14.2%,respectively.Conclusions Memokath stent is a safe and effective method for the treatment of high-risk BPH in elderly patients,but its long-term effects and complications need to be further observed.
作者 张翔翔 宋剑楠 吴烨 王久林 邱镇 张世革 ZHANG Xiang-xiang;SONG Jian-nan;WU Ye;WANG Jiu-lin;QIU Zhen;ZHANG Shi-ge(Department of Urology,Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical Universtity,Nanjing 210024,China)
出处 《实用老年医学》 CAS 2019年第11期1098-1100,共3页 Practical Geriatrics
关键词 前列腺增生 前列腺支架 高危 局麻 benign prostatic hyperplasia Memokath stent high risk local anesthesia
作者简介 通讯作者:张世革,Email:zsg2808@163.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献88

  • 1魏强,董强,林涛,李虹,杨宇如,程鸿鸣,栾荣生.成都市城乡前列腺增生症的流行病学调查[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2000,5(4):194-196. 被引量:3
  • 2那彦群,郝金瑞,刘重禄,山刚志,韩文科,杨勇,周利群,薛兆英,郭应禄.形状记忆合金网状支架治疗前列腺增生症[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1995,16(6):354-356. 被引量:106
  • 3顾方六,山岗志,王通生,薛兆英.北京城乡良性前列腺增生发病的差异[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1995,16(7):387-390. 被引量:61
  • 4屈平保,稽军.前列腺支架治疗失败原因分析[J].中国男科学杂志,2005,19(4):50-51. 被引量:7
  • 5Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'Leary MP, et al. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol, 1992, 148:1549- 1557.
  • 6Garraway WM, Collins GN, Lee RJ. High prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the community. Lancet, 1991, 338: 469-471.
  • 7Chicharro-Molero JA, Burgos'-Rodriguez R, Sanchez Cruz JJ, et al. Prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Spanish men 40 years old or older. J Urol, 1998, 159: 878-882.
  • 8Guess H A. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: antecedents and natural history. Epidemiol Rev, 1992, 14:131-136.
  • 9Homma Y, Kawabe K, Tsukamoto T, et al. Epidemiologic survey of lower urinary tract symptoms in Asia and Australia using the International Prostate Symptom Score. Int Urol,1997, 4: 40-46.
  • 10Safarinejad MR. Prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in a population-based study in Iranian men 40 years old or older, Int Urol Nephrol, 2008, 40:921 -931.

共引文献58

同被引文献32

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部