摘要
本文梳理了二语、母语、个体因素和二语水平等对二语形态一致敏感性(简称语形敏感性)的影响,并基于关键术语的界定和二语水平与其他影响因素协同关系框架的构建,得出如下基本结论:1)对于二语的结构而言,横向上的控制距离越远,纵向上的构成类型层级越低,语形敏感性就越弱;从二语语言特征来看,二语控制成分越复杂,主干词的透明度越低、标记性越强、规则性越小、出现频率越低以及语形成分的变化越丰富,二语者的语形敏感性就越弱。2)二语者自身母语与二语间的语言距离越远,其二语语形敏感性就越弱。3)二语者的习得年龄越大,工作记忆容量越小,其二语的语形敏感性就越弱。4)二语水平不直接作用于二语语形敏感性,而是作为一个调节变量,间接作用于母语、二语和个体等因素,进而动态地影响二语者的语形敏感性,整体上的表现趋势为:二语水平越高,二语的语形敏感性则越强。
This paper analyzed the factors aflecting L2 sensitivity to morphological agreement (SMA) in terms of leamers, LI, L2, individual factors and L2 proficiency. By defining the key terms and building a cooperating framework of L2 proficiency with other factors, the following conclusions were drawn: 1) For L2 structures, long controlling distance along horizontal dimension and lower hierarchy along vertical dimension go with weak SMA;for L2 linguistic features, weak SMA appears for the controlling elements of more complexity, in the head words of low transparency, high markedness, low regularity and low frequency, and in the morphological elements of high variety;2) The long linguistic distance between LI and L2 will have weak SMA;3) L2 learners with late age of acquisition (AoA) and low capacity of working memory have weak SMA;and 4) L2 proficiency does not affect SMA directly, but serves as an indirect and dynamic factor moderating the effects of LI, L2, and individual factors upon SMA, and L2 learners with high proficiency tend to possess strong SMA.
作者
倪传斌
NI Chuanbin(School of Foreign Languages and Cultures,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210097,China)
出处
《外语教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第4期547-559,640,共14页
Foreign Language Teaching and Research
