摘要
面对当代诸多西方学者尝试回归政治经济学批判并重构《资本论》的潮流,如何理解《资本论》三卷本之间的关系又再一次成为重要的解读对象。大卫·哈维从三大资本积累模型的角度解读《资本论》三卷本,并将第二卷、第三卷作为研究的重心。我们认为,对于三卷本之间关系的理论定位,既要结合资本主义社会现实来研究第一卷所聚焦的资本生产逻辑及其在当代的表现形式,又要回到《资本论》的原初语境,依据从抽象上升到具体的方法,完整地理解三卷本所涵盖的资本主义生产与再生产过程。惟有如此,才能推进《资本论》在当代的理论效应。
Many contemporary western scholars are returning to the critique of political economy and are reconstructing the interpretation of Das Kapital ,and,in this context,how to understand the relationship between the three volumes of Das Kapital has once again become an important theoretical front.As a loyal supporter of Marx,David Harvey has made an important contribution to this proposition.In general,he interprets the three volumes as three models of capital accumulation.For this reason,he focuses on the second and third volumes,citing the partial obsolescence of the first.Is the relationship between the three volumes really what Harvey says? The answer is no.We believe that,to define the theoretical relationship between the three volumes,we should study the contemporary transformation of the production logic of capital in the first volume by taking into account the current reality of capitalist society.But we should also return to the original context of Das Kapital and understand the production and reproduction process of capital in three volumes,based on an abstract-to-concrete process.Only in this way can we promote the theoretic understanding of Das Kapital in our time.
出处
《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第3期21-27,共7页
Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基金
南京大学哲学系博士研究生创新项目(2018年度)(NJUDPGRA2018)
关键词
《资本论》
三大资本积累模型
资本生产机制
Das Kapital
three models of capital accumulation
the production mechanism of Capital
作者简介
刘林娟,南京大学哲学系博士研究生.
