摘要
在我国,股东除名制度是对有限责任公司未出资或者抽逃全部出资的股东采取的强制其退出公司的惩罚性措施,也是法律赋予有限责任公司用以督促股东按时足额缴纳出资的手段。随着股权执行案件的增多,法院对公司股权采取冻结措施后,公司对被冻结股权的股东予以除名或者宣布股东失权的决议是否有效的问题日益突出。对股权冻结情况下公司对股东除名或者宣布失权的原因是多样化的,应坚持私法自治原则,司法谨慎介入公司营运空间,在没有证据能够证明存在欺诈情形下,公司股东会通过决议解除股权被冻结的股东资格的决议应为有效。适用股东除名制度有利于平衡公司及其股东与被除名股东及其债权人利益。
In China,the shareholder expulsion system is a punishment measure to force a shareholder of a limited liability company who has not paid capital contribution or has withdrawn all capital contribution to leave the company,and also a means endowed by the law with the limited liability company to urge shareholders to pay their capital contribution in full and on time.With the increase of equity enforcement cases,there is an increasingly prominent issue over the effectiveness of a company resolution on expelling a shareholder or declaring right termination of a shareholder whose share ownership is frozen after the freezing measures taken by the court on the company's equity.The reasons why a company expels a shareholder or declares right termination in the situation of frozen share ownership are diverse,so the principle of autonomy of private law shall be adhered to,the judicial organ shall be prudent and not interfere in company business space as far as possible,and the resolution adopted by the shareholders'meeting on disqualifying a shareholder with frozen share ownership should be effective.The application of the shareholder expulsion system is conducive to balancing the interests among the company,its shareholders,the expelled shareholder and the creditors of the company.
出处
《政治与法律》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第5期145-151,共7页
Political Science and Law
关键词
股东除名
股东除名决议效力
利益冲突
股权冻结
Shareholder Expulsion
Effectiveness of Shareholder Expulsion Resolution
Conflicts of Interest
Freezing Share Ownership
作者简介
雷鑫,中南林业大学政法学院教授。
