期刊文献+

467例急性心肌梗死β受体阻滞剂的应用状况及影响因素分析 被引量:5

Current Application Status of Beta Receptor Blockers and Related Factors in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction:Analysis of 467 Cases
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用回顾性分析方法,统计我院467例急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院患者的临床特征和β受体阻滞剂的使用状况,并运用二分类Logistic回归分析其影响因素。结果显示,AMI患者β受体阻滞剂的使用率仅为64.0%,Logistic回归分析表明,合并2型糖尿病(OR=1.761)、心力衰竭(OR=1.654)、入院时收缩压≥140 mmHg(OR=1.826)、入院时心率>70次/min(OR=1.797)的患者更倾向于使用β受体阻滞剂(P<0.05);入院时收缩压<100 mmHg(OR=0.094)和左室射血分数未测量(OR=0.481)的患者更倾向于不使用β受体阻滞剂(P<0.05);左室射血分数≤40%(OR=1.281)的患者倾向于使用β受体阻滞剂,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在AMI患者中,β受体阻滞剂的临床应用情况与"指南"间存在一定的差距,应加强认识并重视药物治疗。 Clinical data and application of beta receptor blockers of 467 hospitalized patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI)were retrospectively analyzed,and the related factors influencing the utilization of beta receptor blockers were identified by binary logistic regression analysis.The results showed that the application rate of beta receptor blockers was only 64.0%.The multi-factor analysis showed that the patients with diabetes(OR=1.761),heart failure(OR=1.654),systolic blood pressure(SBP)≥140 mmHg(OR=1.826)or heart rate>70 beats/min(OR=1.797)at admission were more likely to accept beta receptor blocker therapy(P<0.05);the patients with SBP<100 mmHg(OR=0.094)or left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)unmeasured(OR=0.481)were less likely to receive beta receptor blocker therapy(P<0.05).Patients with LVEF≤40%(OR=1.281)were inclined to receive beta receptor blocker therapy but without statistical significance(P>0.05).There was an obvious gap between the present situation and the guideline for beta receptor blocker therapy in most of these patients with AMI,which should be improved.
作者 陈瑾瑾 刘培延 张倩 CHEN Jinjin;LIU Peiyan;ZHANG Qian(Department of Pharmacy,Nanjing First Hospital,Nanjing 210006,China)
出处 《药学与临床研究》 2018年第5期371-374,共4页 Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research
关键词 急性心肌梗死 Β受体阻滞剂 LOGISTIC回归分析 Acute myocardial infarction Beta receptor blockers Logistics analysis
作者简介 陈瑾瑾,女,药师E-mail:pxchenjin@163.com;通讯作者张倩,女,药师E-mail:zhangq0619@163.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1杨跃进,杨进刚.提高中国急性心肌梗死患者的救治水平:从注册研究到质量提升[J].中国循环杂志,2014,29(S02):1-2. 被引量:3
  • 2无.慢性心力衰竭诊断治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(12):1076-1095. 被引量:3717
  • 3Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, et al. Predictors of hospitial mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med, 2003, 163: 2345-2353.
  • 4Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation, 2012, 126: 2020-2035.
  • 5Xu H, Li W, Yang J, et al. The China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Registry: A national long-term registry-research- educationintegrated platform for exploring acute myocardialinfaretion in China. Am Heart J, 2016,175: 193-201.
  • 6Neskovic A, Otasevic P, Bojic M, et al. Association of Killip class on admission and left ventricular dilatation. Am Heart J, 1999, 137: 361.
  • 7Yang G, Wang Y, Zeng Y, et al. Rapid health transition in China, 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 2013, 381: 1987-2015.
  • 8Lindahl B, Diderholm E, LagerqvistB, et al. Mechanisms behind the prognostic value of troponin T in unstable coronary artery disease: a FRISC II substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001, 38: 979-986.
  • 9E1-Menyar A, Zubaid M, AlMahmeed W, et al. Killip classification in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insight from a muhicenter registry. Am J Emerg Med, 2012, 30: 97-103.
  • 10Steg PG, Dabbous OH, Feldman LJ, et al. Determinants and prognostic impact of heart failure complicating acute coronary syndromes: observations from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events(GRACE). Circulation, 2004, 109: 494-499.

共引文献5605

同被引文献46

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部