期刊文献+

美国佐治亚大学教师晋升评价制度:文本分析与实践考察 被引量:1

Research on Faculty Promotion Evaluation System at the University of Georgia:Textual Analysis and Practical Examination
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 教师晋升评价制度是现代大学制度的重要组成部分,对教师的职业发展至关重要。佐治亚大学现行的教师晋升评价制度于2004年起施行,是一套典型的同行评议制度。这套制度的特征主要体现在四个方面:注重评价的专业性,教师晋升权主要在教师手中;追求评价的公平性,尊重候选教师的权利;建立较为健全的评价监督机制;秉持教学、科研、服务兼顾的晋升评价标准。同时,研究通过对该校教师和管理者的访谈也发现,教师晋升评价制度存在递进性原则的效果饱受争议、副教授晋升教授时缺乏有效的动力机制、申诉程序有待进一步完善、晋升评价标准偏低、晋升辅导尚待制度化等问题。 Faculty promotion is an important part of modern university system,which is critical to the development of faculty's career.Current version of faculty promotion system in the University of Georgia has been carried out since2004,which could be considered as a set of typical peer review system.The characteristics of the system are mainly reflected in four aspects as follows,focusing on the professionalization of the evaluation,seeking the fairness of evaluation while respecting the rights of the candidate,establishing a sound evaluation and supervision mechanism,using a set of promotion criteria which consider teaching,research and service equally.Meanwhile,some problems of this system are revealed by interviewing faculty and administrators at this university.First,the effect of progressive principle of this mechanism is still full of controversies.Secondly,there is a lack of motivation mechanism for associate professor seek full professorship.Thirdly,the appeal procedures need to be improved.Fourthly,promotion evaluation oriteria is relatively low.Fifthly,promotion coaching needs to be institutionalized.
作者 李函颖 LI Han-ying(School of Education, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan Hubei 430074, China)
出处 《苏州大学学报(教育科学版)》 2017年第3期113-121,共9页 Journal of Soochow University(Educational Science Edition)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"美国大学教师晋升评价的正式规则与非正式规则研究"(项目编号:16YJC880029)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 佐治亚大学 教师晋升 评价 递进性原则 University of Georgia faculty promotion evaluation the progressive principle
作者简介 李函颖(1986—),女,湖南衡阳人,博士,华中科技大学教育科学研究院讲师,主要从事比较高等教育、高等教育政策与管理研究。
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1李勇,闵维方.若干世界一流大学成本结构的比较研究[J].全球教育展望,2007,36(5):38-41. 被引量:6
  • 2朱司曼.《21世纪高等教育面临的挑战》,见阿特巴赫等编《21世纪的美国高等教育》(第2版),中国海洋大学出版社2007年版,第88-123页.
  • 3Yuker, Harold (1984), Faculty Workload: Research Theory and Interpretation. 1984. Washington, D. C... Association for the Study of Higher Education.
  • 4March 22, 2011, A Heavier Load inOhio by Dan Berrett.
  • 5Robert S. Decker, els, (2007). "A profile of federal-grant administrative Burdon among Federal Demonstration Partnership faculty. ".
  • 6黄茂树,Strategi Management of Human Resources amongTeaching Institutions in Higher Education, unpublished PPT for the CHAIR Fourth International Conference. 2010. 5.
  • 7http://www, provost, umieh, edu/reportsfflexible tenure/ changeFAQ, html.
  • 8Dan Berrett, Tenur Changes Coming to'Brown U. Februar 8, 2011. Inside Higher ED website.
  • 9Jan de Vries, "the solicitationof external letters of evaluation" http://apo, chance, berke ley. edu/external, ltrs. disc. paper, btm.
  • 10"Principles for Tenure Review for Instructional Track facul-ty at the University of Michigan",2002年2月7日.

共引文献21

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部