摘要
2016年12月1日,Core Wireless标准必要专利故意侵权案的判决首次明确了针对标准必要专利故意侵权问题判决惩罚性赔偿的合理性。美国惩罚性赔偿的审判标准经历了3个阶段:1983年Underwater案的"合理注意义务"标准、2007年的Seagate案的"客观轻率"标准和2016年Halo案的"主观恶意"标准。现有对于故意侵权行为的惩罚性赔偿的相关理论和制度主要是美国等发达地区的产物,与这些国家的技术水平、知识产权保护状况等方面紧密相关,我国应在此基础上探索具有我国特色的惩罚性赔偿制度。
On December 1st, 2016, the judgement of Core Wireless SEP infringement case verified the reasonablity for puntive damage of SEP willful infringement for the first time. The judgement standards of puntive damage went through three stages: the affirmative duty of due care standard in Underwater case, 1983; the objective reckless standard in Seagate case, 2007; the subjective malicious standard in Halo case, 2016. Current punitive damage-related theries and principle for willful infringement are derived from develop territoies such as the Unitate States, which are tightly related with the techinical levels, the status of IPR protection and so on in such countries. Above all, we shall try to establish prinples of puntive damge with Chinese characteristics.
出处
《电信网技术》
2017年第1期15-19,共5页
Telecommunications Network Technology
关键词
故意侵权
惩罚性赔偿
专利侵权
willful infringemtn
punitive damage
patent infringement
