摘要
[目的/意义]我国新型智库建设起步较晚,多数智库机构是从学术机构转换而来,仍然沿袭传统学术模式,所以导致了智库研究存在偏学术轻政策的问题。[方法/过程]文章从学术研究和智库研究的内涵出发,分析出两者之间的9个相同点和10个不同点。[结果/结论]就学术研究与智库研究的10个不同点给出了学术研究转化为智库研究的具体措施建议,期望为学术机构向智库转型过程中存在的偏学术轻政策问题提供一些解决方案。
[ Purpose/significance] The construction of new think tanks in China started relatively late. Most think tank institu- tions have evolved from academic institutions and still follow the traditional academic patterns. This leads to the problem of prefer- ence to academics over policies in think tank research. [ Method/process ] This paper starts from the connotation of academic research and think tank research, and figures out nine similarities and ten differences between the two kinds of research. [ Result/ conclusion ~ The paper proposes concrete suggestions for the transformation from academic research to think tank research in terms of the ten different points, and hopes to provide some solutions for the problem of preference to academics over policies in the transfor- mation process.
出处
《情报理论与实践》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第11期1-5,共5页
Information Studies:Theory & Application
关键词
学术研究
智库研究
转化机制
研究主题
影响力
academic research
think tank research
transformation mechanism
research topic
influence
作者简介
初景利（ORCID：0000-0003-0723—3985），男，1962年生，博士，教授，博士生导师。研究方向：智库理论与实践研究，数字出版与传播研究，网络信息服务。;唐果媛（ORCID：0000-0001-8992-0230，通讯作者），女，1989年生，博士生，编辑。研究方向：智库理论与实践研究，数字出版与传播研究，文献计量学。
