摘要
目的 :汉化实习护生学业支持感知量表(AcademicSupportinthePracticumScale,EAPAP),并对其进行信度、效度检验。方法 :征得原作者授权后,通过翻译、回译及文化调适,形成中文版EAPAP量表,并在253名实习护生中进行信度、效度评价。结果 :中文版EAPAP量表包括4个维度,共23个条目,4个公因子累积贡献率为83.094%。量表Cronbach’sα系数为0.958,各维度Cronbach’sα系数为0.924~0.981;分半信度为0.960(P<0.001)。各维度与量表总分的相关系数r为0.728~0.858,各维度之间的相关系数r为0.378~0.662,均具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。条目内容效度指数(Item-ContentValidityIndex,I-CVI)为0.800~1.000,量表内容效度指数(Scale-Content Validity Index,S-CVI)为0.950。结论 :中文版EAPAP量表在我国实习护生中具有良好的信度、效度,可用于评价实习护生的学业支持现状。
Objective： To translate the Academic Support in the Practicum Scale （EAPAP） into Chinese and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods： After obtaining authorization from the original authors, the standard procedures of double- back translation and cross-cultural adaptation were conducted. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of EAPAP were tested in 253 nursing students. Results： The Chinese version of EAPAP included 23 items and factor analysis extracted four common factors, which explained 83.094% of the total variance. Cronbach＇s a coefficient was 0.958, and Cronbach＇s a for four dimensions ranged from 0.924 to 0.981. The split-half coefficient was 0.960 （P〈0.001）. Spearman-Brown coefficients between four dimensions and scale varied from 0.728 to 0.858. Spearman-Brown coefficients of 4 dimensions varied from 0.378 to 0.662. Item-Content Validity Index （I-CVI） ranged from 0.800 to 1.000 and Scale-Content Validity Index （S-CVI） was 0.950. Conclusions： The Chinese version of EAPAP is suggested to be valid and reliable and can be used among Chinese nursing students.
作者
李晨阳
张春梅
侯振华
季雨楠
谢铃莉
刘彦慧
LI Chenyang;ZHANG Chunmei;HOU Zhenhua;JI Yu＇nan;XIE Lingli;LIU Yanhui(School of Nursing,Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,301617,China)
出处
《中国护理管理》
CSCD
北大核心
2018年第9期1192-1196,共5页
Chinese Nursing Management
基金
天津市卫生和计划生育委员会中医中西医结合科研课题(2017107)
关键词
学生
护理
学业支持
信度
效度
students
nursing
academic support
reliability
validity
作者简介
李晨阳，硕士在读，主管护师;通信作者：刘彦慧，博士，教授，院长，E-mail：yhliu888@163．com
