摘要
证据推理是司法裁判活动中关于事实发现的推理,它是建构司法裁决三段论小前提唯一的理性思维形式。但是长期以来,在法律逻辑领域,证据推理通常是被涵盖在法律推理或者法律论证理论范畴中而不被视为一个独立的研究对象。直到最近的十余年间,证据推理开始被一些法律逻辑学者所关注,尤其在横跨法律、逻辑学、认知科学、计算机科学的法律与人工智能领域得到较为深入的研究。通过对当前国内外证据推理研究现状进行梳理和概括,反映出与国外丰富的研究成果相比,国内存在明显的理论阙如。
Evidential reasoning is reasoning about fact-finding in judicial decision-making phase, and it is the onlyform of rational thinking, by which the minor premises of judicial syllogism can be obtained. However, for a longperiod of time, it was considered more as a minor research subject attached to legal reasoning or legal argument,rather than as an independent topic in legal logic. In recent decade, however, evidential reasoning is paid attentiongreatly by some researchers .Especially, in the field of Artificial Intelligence and Law（AIL）,a multidisciplinaryfield, it has been subjected to intensive study. There is an overview of research status about evidential reasoning athome and abroad. we can see that compared with foreign abundant fruit of research, domestic research result isobviously inadequate.
作者
秦波
QIN Bo(School of Economics and Business Management,Xinyang Vocational TechnicalCollege,Xinyang 464000,China)
出处
《广东农工商职业技术学院学报》
2018年第3期64-69,共6页
Journal of Guangdong Agriculture Industry Business Polytechnic
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目"逻辑真理论的历史源流
理论前沿与应用研究"(17ZDA025)
关键词
证据推理
研究历史
研究现状
evidential reasoning
research history
research status
作者简介
秦波（1975-）,河南信阳人,哲学博士,讲师,研究方向：法律逻辑与逻辑哲学.
