摘要
有关言语行为理论的过往研究多偏重施事行为,对取效行为几无论及。倍受青睐的施事行为是否尚存讨论空间?倍受冷落的取效行为是否确有关注价值?此两问题便是本文探究的出发点。我们拟依循Halliday的言语交际观,以给予(giving)和求取(demanding)为参数,在Austin言语行为理论框架内尝试把施事行为区分为:求取式言语行为、主动给予式言语行为和回应性给予式言语行为三类,并增补言语取效准则,以消减过往研究的繁杂,规避人们对取效行为的误解。
Discontented with the cumbersome portrayal of the illocutionary act and absent treatment to the perlocutionary act in the previous studies on speech acts, the author tends to focus on the questions whether the illocutionary act remains space for further discussion, and how to treat the perlocutionary act fairly. Following Halliday＇s concept of language communication and his view of giving and demanding, we divide the illocutionary act into three subtypes： demanding act, initiative giving act and responsive giving act, and supplement the maxim of speech utility for the perlocutionary act, within the framework of Austin＇s speech act theory, so as to simplify the complicated and redundant explorations on the illocutionary act, while avoiding the misunderstanding of the perlocutionary act.
作者
向明友
XIANG Mingyou(International University of Business and Economic)
出处
《现代外语》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期541-549,共9页
Modern Foreign Languages
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"基于语料库的英汉话语标记语语义结构与语用功能研究"(13BYY018)
北京市哲学社会科学规划项目"‘困境求变’:语用研究的经济分析视角"(13WYB006)的阶段性成果
关键词
言语行为
求取式
主动给予式
回应性给予式
言语生效准则
speech act
demanding act
initiative giving act
responsive giving act
maxim of speech utility
作者简介
通讯作者：向明友〈xiangmingyou@163．com〉100029北京市朝阳区惠新东街10号院对外经济贸易大学英语学院
