期刊文献+

再次剖宫产同时切除原子宫切口瘢痕对剖宫产术后瘢痕憩室形成的预防意义 被引量:19

The significance of previous uterine scar excision during the second cesarean section on prevention of previous cesarean scar diverticulum by previous uterine scar excision during the second cesarean section
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨再次剖宫产时切除原子宫瘢痕对剖宫产术后瘢痕憩室(PCSD)形成的预防意义。方法选择2012年1月至2017年1月再次(二次)接受剖宫产的178例患者,随机数字表法分为对照组(术毕子宫切口直接给予双层连续缝合)与观察组(术毕先切除原切口的瘢痕组织、再行双层连续缝合),每组89例。对两组手术相关指标进行统计处理,均随访1年,记录两组阴道异常流血、PCSD、憩室残余的肌层厚度及憩室体积等情况。结果与对照组比较,观察组手术时间、出血量、首次排气时间、术后恶露时间及住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P 〉 0.05);但观察组阴道异常流血发生率、PCSD发生率明显降低[5.6%(5/89)比14.6%(13/89)、3.4%(3/89)比12.4%(11/89)],憩室残余的肌层厚度增大[(7.36 ± 1.66)mm比(4.86 ± 1.38)mm]、憩室容积缩小[(0.37 ± 0.16)ml比(0.54 ± 0.15)ml],差异有统计学意义(P 〈 0.05)。结论针对再次接受剖宫产孕妇在术中同时切除原子宫瘢痕对子宫切口的愈合更有利,除了降低形成PCSD概率的同时PCSD程度也得到减轻。 Objective To investigate the significance of previous uterine scar excision during the second cesarean section on prevention of previous cesarean scar diverticulum (PCSD). Methods One hundred and seventy-eight cases of multipara women who underwent the second cesarean section were included from January 2012 to January 2017. And they were divided into the control group and the observation group by random digital table, with 89 cases in each group. In the control group, the uterine incision was directly closed by double-layer continuous suture without any treatment to the previous scar, and in the observation group, the previous uterine cesarean scar of the patients were removed, and then the uterine incision was closed by double-layer continuous suture. The surgical related indexes of the two groups were recorded and statistically analyzed. All patients were followed up for 1 year, and the abnormal vaginal bleeding, PCSD, the residual musculocutaneous thickness of diverticulum and the volume of diverticulum were statistically analyzed in those two groups. Results There were no statistical difference between observation group and control group in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, evacuation time, the duration of postoperation bloody lochia and hospitalization time (P 〉 0.05). However, the abnormal vaginal bleeding [5.6%(5/89) vs. 14.6%(13/89)], the incidence of PCSD: 3.4% (3/89) vs. 12.4% (11/89), and the residual musculocutaneous thickness of diverticulum: (7.36 ± 1.66) mm vs. (4.86 ± 1.38) mm, and the volume of diverticulum: (0.37 ± 0.16) ml vs. (0.54±0.15) ml in the observation group were decreased respectively, the differences were statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions Excision of previous uterine scar during the second cesarean section is more beneficial for uterine section healing. It will reduce the frequency of PCSD formation, and alleviate the severity of PCSD.
作者 邱伟 吴土连 黄艳 Qiu Wei;Wu Tulian;Huang Yan.(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gaozhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangdong Gaozhou 525200, Chin)
出处 《中国医师进修杂志》 2018年第6期524-527,共4页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词 剖宫产术 瘢痕 憩室 瘢痕切除术 切口愈合 Cesarean section repeat Cicatrix Diverticulum Excision scar Section healing
作者简介 通信作者:邱伟,Emai|:tige78@126.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献93

  • 1冯淑英,陈立斌,黄利娟,梁玉萍,陈湘云,杨冬梓.剖宫产切口宫壁缺损的宫腔镜诊断(附48例分析)[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(7):755-758. 被引量:20
  • 2韩运生,莫清清.剖宫产术后子宫切口愈合不良超声学检查结果分析[J].安徽医药,2007,11(2):160-161. 被引量:18
  • 3Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, et al. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 34(1):85-89.
  • 4Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Wiggs CD, et al. Pregnancy after classic cesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 100(5 Pt 1):946-950.
  • 5Thurmond AS, Harvey W J, Smith SA. Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 1999, 18(1):15-16.
  • 6Fabres C, Aviles G, De La Jara C, et al. The cesarean delivery scar pouch: clinical implications and diagnostic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2003, 22(7):695-700.
  • 7Surapaneni K, Silberzweig JE. Cesarean section scar diverticulum: appearance on hysterosalpingography[J]. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 190(4):870-874.
  • 8Chang Y, Tsai EM, Long CY, et al. Resectoscopic treatment combined with sonohysterographic evaluation of women with postmenstrual bleeding as a result of previous cesarean delivery sear defects[J]. Am J Obstet Gyneeol, 2009, 200(4): 370.
  • 9Fabres C, Arriagada P, Fernandez C, et al. Surgical treatment and follow-up of women with intermenstmal bleeding due to cesarean section scar defect[J]. J Minim Invasive Gyneeol, 2005, 12(1):25-28.
  • 10Luo L, Niu G, Wang Q, et al. Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar diverticula[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2012, 19(4):454-458.

共引文献151

同被引文献153

引证文献19

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部