期刊文献+

Ⅰb1~Ⅱa2期宫颈癌的DWI相关参数与其盆腔淋巴结转移的相关性 被引量:11

To investigate the correlation between DWI related parameters of cervical cancer in stage Ⅰ_(b1)~Ⅱ_(A2)and its pelvic lymph node metastasis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Ⅰ_(b1)~Ⅱ_(a2)期宫颈癌的DWI值与其在盆腔淋巴结转移中的相关性。方法回顾性分析于2014年1月至2016年7月行手术并病理证实的103例Ⅰ_(b1)~Ⅱ_(a2)宫颈癌患者的病例资料,宫颈鳞癌78例(淋巴结转移22例,非淋巴结转移56例),宫颈腺癌组25例(淋巴结转移9例,非淋巴结转移16例)。患者在术前均行MR检查。分别对两组间、各组内转移与非转移病灶组间表观弥散系数ADC值(mean ADC、min ADC、max ADC)进行统计学分析。结果宫颈癌各ADC值与临床FIGO分期均无相关性(Pmean=0.847、Pmin=0.393、Pmax=0.219);鳞癌mean ADC值、min ADC值、max ADC值[(0.84±0.09)×10^(-3)mm^2/s、(0.78±0.09)×10^(-3)mm^2/s、(0.86±0.07)×10^(-3)mm^2/s]均低于腺癌各ADC值[(0.98±0.04)×10^(-3)mm^2/s、(0.93±0.09)×10^(-3)mm^2/s、(0.97±0.23)×10^(-3)mm^2/s],差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);各组内淋巴结转移组mean ADC值、min ADC值均低于非淋巴结转移组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),而两者max ADC值无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论宫颈癌病灶的ADC值与淋巴结转移具有一定相关性,可有助于预测淋巴结转移的风险。 Objective To investigate the correlation between DWI value of cervical cancer in stage Ⅰb1-ⅡA2 and its pelvic lymph node metastasis. Methods 103 patients with cervical cancer of stage Ⅰb1-Ⅱa2 confimed by surgery and pathology in our hospital from January 2014 to July2016 were retro-spectively studied, 78 cases of cervical squamous cell carcinoma group (lymph node metastasis of 22 cases, non- lymph node metastasis 56 cases) ; 25 cases of Cervical adenocareinoma group (9 cases with lymph node metastasis, 16 cases of no lymph node metastasis ). All patients with preoperative were performed MR routine scan and DWI examination. The ADC value (meanADC, minADC and maxADC between the two groups and between the groups with and without metastasis were statistically analyzed. Results The value of ADC staging of cervical carcinoma had no correlation with clinical FIGO stage (Pmean = 0.847, Pmin = 0.393, Pmax = 0.219 ). The meanADC values minADC value, maxADC value [ ( 0.84 ± 0.09 )×10^-3mm^2/s ± ( 0.78 ± 0.09 )×10^-3mm^2/s. ( 0.86 2:0.07 )×10^-3mm^2/s] of Squamous cell carcinomas was lower than that of adenocarcinoma [ (0.98 ± 0.04)×10^-3mm^2/s, ( 0.93 ± 0.09 )×10^-3mm^2/s, ( 0.97 ± 0.23 ) ×10^-3mm^2/s ] and the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). The meanADC values and minADC value of cervical cancer within each group in lymph node metastasis group was lower than that of non- lymph node metastasis group, the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). The maxADC value had no significant difference (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion The ADC value of cervical cancer has some correlation with lymph node metastasis, which can be helpful to predict the risk of lymph node metastasis.
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第3期431-434,共4页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 宫颈癌 淋巴结转移 表观弥散系数 cervical cancer lymph node metastasis apparent diffusion coefficients
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1Sala E,Rockall A,Rangarajanc D. The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the female pelvis[J].European Journal of Radiology,2010,(03):367-385.
  • 2Punwani S. Diffusion weighted imaging of female pelvic cancers:Concepts and clinical applications[J].European Journal of Radiology,2011,(01):21-29.
  • 3Kim HS,Kim SY. A prospective study on the added value of pulsed arterial spin-labeling and apparent diffusion coefficients in the grading of gliomas[J].American Journal of Neuroradiology,2007,(09):1693-1699.doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0674.
  • 4Higano S,Yun X,Kumabe T. Malignant astrocytic tumors:clinical importance of apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of grade and prognosis[J].Radiology,2006,(03):839-846.
  • 5Zhang J,Tehrani YM,Wang L. Renal masses:characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging-a preliminary experience[J].Radiology,2008,(02):458-464.
  • 6Hoogendam JP,Klerkx WM,de Kort GA. The Influence of the b-Value Combination on Apparent Diffusion Coeffecient Based Differentiation Between Malignant and Benign Tissue in Cervical Cancer[J].Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging,2010,(02):376-382.
  • 7Bilimoria KY,Bentrem DJ,Rock CE. Outcomes and prognostic factors for squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal:analysis of patients from the National Cancer Data Base[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum,2009,(04):624-631.
  • 8Payne GS,Schmidt M,Morgan VA. Evaluation of magnetic resonance diffusion and spectroscopy measurements as predictive biomarkers in stage 1 cervical cancer[J].Gynecologic Oncology,2010,(02):246-252.
  • 9Liu Y,Bai R,Sun H. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of uterine cervical cancer[J].Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography,2009,(06):858-862.
  • 10Heatley MK. Systematic review and meta-analysis in anatomic pathology:the value of nuclear DNA content in predicting progression in low grade CIN,the significance of the histological subtype on prognosis in cervical carcinoma[J].Histology and Histopathology,1999,(01):203-215.

共引文献74

同被引文献125

引证文献11

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部