期刊文献+

甲烷/石松子两相混合体系爆炸强度参数 被引量:6

Explosion severity parameters of hybrid mixture of methane and lycopodium dust
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于改进的20 L球形粉尘爆炸装置,在相同初始条件下分别测量了甲烷、石松子粉尘和甲烷/石松子两相混合体系的爆炸压力、爆炸压力上升速率和爆炸指数等参数,系统研究了甲烷/石松子粉尘两相混合体系爆炸特性变化规律。结果表明:甲烷的添加能显著提高低质量浓度石松子粉尘爆炸压力而降低高质量浓度石松子粉尘爆炸压力;甲烷对石松子粉尘最大爆炸压力没有显著影响,但能显著提高石松子粉尘最大爆炸压力上升速率。甲烷/石松子粉尘混合体系爆炸指数高于单相石松子粉尘爆炸指数,但甲烷/石松子粉尘混合体系和单相石松子粉尘爆炸指数均低于单相甲烷爆炸指数。工业生产过程中应避免粉尘混入可燃气体以降低粉尘爆炸危险性。 A modified 20 L standard spherical dust explosion vessel was used to systematically study the explosion characteristics of the methane/lycopodium hybrid mixtures. The explosion pressure( pex),the explosion pressure rise rate( dp/dt)exand the explosive deflagration index( Kst) of the single-phase methane,the single-phase lycopodium dust,and the methane/lycopodium hybrid mixtures were measured under the same initial conditions. The results showed that methane could obviously enhance the explosion pressure pexof low-concentration lycopodium dust but reduce the pexof high-concentration lycopodium dust. It was proved that methane had no significant effects on the maximum explosion pressure pmaxof lycopodium dust. But it could significantly increase the maximum explosion pressure rise rate( dp/dt)max. By evaluating the Kst,it was found that the explosive deflagration index of the methane/lycopodium hybrid mixtures was higher than that of singlephase lycopodium dust. However,the explosive deflagration indices of both methane/lycopodium hybrid mixtures and single-phase lycopodium dusts were lower than that of single-phase methane. Therefore,the coexistence of combustible gas and combustible dust in industrial production process should be avoided to reduce the risk of dust explosions.
出处 《爆炸与冲击》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期92-97,共6页 Explosion and Shock Waves
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51604057 51574056)
关键词 粉尘爆炸 气/粉尘两相体系 爆炸强度 甲烷 石松子 dust explosion hybrid mixtures explosion severity methane lycopodium
作者简介 喻健良(963-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,yujianliang@dlut.edu.cn.
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1Amyotte P R, Eckhoff R K. Dust explosion causation, prevention and mitigation: an overview [ J ]. Journal of Chemical Health &Safety,2010,10( 1 ) :15 -28.
  • 2Abbasi T, Abbasi S A. Dust explosions-cases, causes, consequences, and control [ J ]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2007,140(1/2) :7 -44.
  • 3Eckhoff R K. Dust explosions in the process industries [ M ]. 3rd ed. Burlington : Gulf Professional Publishing,2002 : 582 - 583.
  • 4National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 68. Standard on explosion protection by deflagration venting [ S ]. 2007 ed. Quincy : BatterymarchParck ,2007.
  • 5European Committee for Standardization, EN 14491. Dust explosion venting protective systems [ S ]. Brussels : British Standard Institute ,2006.
  • 6Ismaila A, Andrews G E, Abdullahi I, et al. Venting as a means of mitigating explosions: the need to revised European and USA ( NFPA 68 ) guidance for explosion venting [J] . Archives of Applied Science Research, 2012,4 ( 1 ) : 155 - 168.
  • 7Alberto T, Ruiz A, Aguado P J. Dust explosions in vented silos:simulations and comparisons with current standards [ J ]. Powder Technology,2011,208 (3) :717 - 724.
  • 8Alberto T, Aguado P J, Ramirez A. Dust explosion venting in silos : a comparison of standards NFPA 68 and EN 14491 [ J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2009,22 (2) :204 -209.
  • 9Holbrow P. Dust explosion venting of small vessels and tameless venting [ J ]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection ,2013,91 ( 3 ) : 183 - 190.
  • 10American Society for Testing, Materials, E 1226. Standard test method for explosibility of dust clouds [ S ]. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2010.

共引文献8

同被引文献74

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部