期刊文献+

2016年乡村全科执业助理医师资格考试(试点)实践技能考试成绩相关因素分析 被引量:3

Score analysis of pilot clinical skill test of China medical licensing examination for rural assistant general physicians
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较和分析2016年参加乡村全科执业助理医师资格考试(试点)的9省(自治区、直辖市)20866名考生的实践技能考试成绩,总结经验,提出意见和建议。方法采用通过率、掌握率和平均分比较不同考生群体和不同内容模块的考试成绩,分析导致成绩差异的因素。结果考试通过率与考生性别、民族、地域、学历、工作经历等因素相关,常见检查和操作项目掌握率较好,理论知识水平不高。结论试点考试达到预期目标,考试数据分析结果验证了考试设计的科学性和合理性,为考试正式实施奠定了基础,也为决策部门进一步加强基层医疗卫生队伍建设提供了参考依据。 Objective To compare and analyze the clinical skill score of 20 866 candidates from 9 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) in 2016 China pilot medical licensing examination for rural assistant general physicians, learn from the analysis and further improve the examination. Methods Passing rate, rate of correct answer and mean score are applied in comparison and analysis. Results Passing rate is related to gender, nationality, district, education and career background. Routine physical examinations and operations are best observed, while basic knowledge needs to be improved. Conclusions The result of examination data analysis verifies the scientificity and rationality of the examination design, and lays the foundation for the formal implementation of the examination. It also provides a reference for the decision-making department to further strengthen the construction of primary medical and health teams.
出处 《中华医学教育杂志》 2017年第3期465-469,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education
关键词 乡村全科助理医师 实践技能考试 成绩分析 Rural assistant general physicians Clinical skill test Score analysis
作者简介 通信作者:李樯,Email:nmecsc@163.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1Reckase M D. Innovative methods for helping standard-setting par-ticipants to perform their task:the role of feedback regarding con-sistency,accuracy,and impact[A].Mahwah,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc,2001.159-173.
  • 2Hess B,Subhiyah R G,Giordano C. Convergence Between Cluster Analysis and the Angoff Method for Setting Minimum Passing Scores on Credentialing Examinations[J].EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS,2007,(04):362-375.
  • 3Angoff W H. Scales,norms and equivalent scores[A].Washington,DC:American Council on Education,1971.508-600.
  • 4Impara J C,Plake B S. Standard Setting:An Alternative Aproach[J].Journal of Educational Measurement,1997,(04):353-366.
  • 5Cizek G J. Conjectures on the rise and call of standard setting:An introduction to context and practic[A].Mahwah,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc,2001.3-17.
  • 6Hambleton R K. Setting performance standards on achievement tests:Meeting the requirements of Title I[A].Washington,DC:Council of Chief State School Officers,1998.97-104.
  • 7Swanson D B,Dillon G F,Ross L E. Setting content-based stan-dards for national board exams:initial research for the Comprehen-sive Part I Examination[J].Academic Medicine,1990,(09):17-i8.
  • 8Chinn R N,Hertz N R. Alternative Approaches to Standard Setting for Licensing and Certification Examinations[J].Applied Measure- ment in Education,2002,(01):1-14.
  • 9Brandon P R. Conclusions About Frequently Studied Modified An- goff Standard-Setting Topics[J].Applied Measurement in Educa- tion,2004,(01):59-88.
  • 10Plake B S. Setting Performance Standards for Professional Licen- sure and Certification[J].Applied and Measurement in Education,1998,(01):65-80.

共引文献4

同被引文献4

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部