期刊文献+

主题词组合新颖性与论文学术影响力的关系研究 被引量:32

Relationship Between Novelty of Key-Term Combinations and Papers' Scientific Impact
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的/意义]研究学术论文内容的组合新颖性与其学术影响力的关系,为研究论文的学术影响力提供新的研究视角。[方法/过程]采用文本挖掘方法对论文题目、摘要和关键词中的主题词进行提取,通过构建领域主题词共现网络,为每篇论文设计了新颖组合率、中等组合率和常规组合率3个指标,将领域论文划分为不同的新颖性/常规性类型,然后对不同类型论文中高被引论文所占的比例进行统计分析。[结果/结论]同时具有主题词组合高新颖性和高常规性特点的论文成为高被引论文的几率显著高于其他类型的论文,因此建议研究者在科学研究中应注重新颖知识与常规知识的适当组合。 [ Purpose/significance ] We study the combinational novelty of academic papers' contents, providing a new perspective for research in academic impact. [ Method/process ] We apply text mining methods for extracting key- terms in the title, abstract and keywords part of all papers in a particular research field, and design three indicators- no- vel, medium and conventional combination rates for each paper by constructing a key-term co-occurrence network. Then we divide all papers into different novelty/convention combination types, and analyze the proportion of highly cited papers for different combination types. [ Result/conclusion] We find that papers of high novelty and high conventionality have a significantly higher probability of becoming highly cited papers than other types of papers. The results imply that research- ers should seek appropriate combination of novel and conventional knowledge in the process of scientific research.
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第9期87-93,共7页 Library and Information Service
基金 北京市自然科学基金预探索项目"发明过程和机理的概念地图表示研究"(项目编号:9153020) 国家社会科学青年基金项目"基于多维信息计量分析的学术影响力综合评价研究"(项目编号:15CTQ023)研究成果之一
关键词 主题词 组合新颖性 被引频次 共现网络 key-term combinational novelty citation frequency co-occurrence network
作者简介 任海英(ORCII):0000—0002—1197—6709),副教授,博士: 王德营(ORCID:0000-0002-4626-9772),硕士研究生,通讯作音,E-mail:wangd)9217@163.com; 王菲菲(ORCID:0000-0002-1717-9719),副教授,博士。
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献30

  • 1何雪英.SCI引文的检索技巧[J].中国索引,2007,5(3):62-64. 被引量:7
  • 2Huang Y, Wang J. A bibliometric study of the trend in articlesrelated to eutrophication published in Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 2011,89 ( 3 ) : 919 - 927.
  • 3Singleton A. Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis; from the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics. Learned Publishing, 2012, 23 (3) : 267 - 268.
  • 4Fu HZ, Chuang KY, Wang MH, et al. Characteristics of research in China assessed with Essential Science Indicators. Scientometrics, 2011,88(3) :841 -862.
  • 5Han W, Leydesdorff L. Korean journals in the Science Citation Index : What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S & T in Korea? Scientometrics, 2008, 75(3) : 439 -462.
  • 6Andreis M, Jokie M. An impact of Croatian journals measured by citation analysis from SCI-expanded database in time span 1975 : 2001. Scientometrics, 2008, 75(2) : 263 -288.
  • 7Sotudeh, H. How sustainable a scientifically developing country could be in its specialties? The case of Iran: publications in SCI in the 21st century compared to 1980s. Scientometrics, 2012, 91 (1) : 231 - 243.
  • 8Collazo-ReyesF, Luna - Morales ME, Russell JM, et al. Publication and citation patterns of Latin American & Caribbean journals in the SCI and SSCI from 1995 to 2004. Scientometrics, 2008,75(1) : 145 -161.
  • 9Chuang KY, Wang MH, Ho YS. High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the essential science indicators database of the institute for scientific information. Scientometrics, 2011, 87 ( 3 ) :551 - 562.
  • 10Miyairi N, Chang HW. Bibliometric characteristics of highly cited papers from Taiwan, 2000 -2009. Scientometrics, 2012, 92 ( 1 ) : 197 - 205.

共引文献210

同被引文献401

引证文献32

二级引证文献163

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部