期刊文献+

震区社会易损性对比分析:以芦山与鲁甸地震为例 被引量:4

Comparative analysis of social vulnerability of seismic areas:a case study of Lushan earthquake and Ludian earthquake
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为揭示区域社会易损性对地震灾害造成的损失的影响,以芦山和鲁甸地震灾区为研究区,根据统计资料和实地考察结果,构建包括10个指标的社会易损性评价指标体系,并利用熵值法综合评判2震区的社会易损性,进而证明震区社会易损性与地震灾害损失的因果关系。结果表明,低震级、波及范围小的鲁甸地震死亡人数大于高震级、波及范围大的芦山地震死亡人数,其原因之一是鲁甸地震灾区的社会易损性大于芦山地震灾区的。 In order to reveal the effect of regional social vulnerability on the losses caused by the earthquakes, Lushan earthquake stricken area and Ludian earthquake stricken area were selected as the study object. Based on the statistical data and field investigations, an evaluation indicator system of social vulnerability was established. Using the entropy value method, the social vulnerability of Lushan earthquake stricken area and that of Ludian earthquake stricken area were comprehensively evaluated. The results showed that the social vulnerability of Ludian earthquake-stricken area was greater than that of Lushan earthquake-stricken area, and that one of the reasons why the small magnitude of Ludian earthquake caused Heavier casualties was the greater regional social vulnerability.
作者 庙成 丁明涛 MIAO Cheng DING Mingtao(School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510275, China School of Environment and Resource, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang Sichuan 621010, China)
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第4期169-174,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(41371185) 四川省青年科技基金资助(2017JQ0051) 教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务项目(工程科技人才培养研究)(15JDGC019)
关键词 社会易损性 对比分析 熵值法 芦山地震 鲁甸地震 social vulnerability comparative analysis entropy method Lushan earthquake Ludian earthquake
作者简介 庙成(1989-),男,宁夏银川人,博士研究生,研究方向为地质灾害风险控制与管理。E—mail:miaocheng19890922@163.com。 通信作者:丁明涛(1981-),男,山东日照人,博士,教授,主要从事地质灾害风险控制与聚落减灾研究。E-mail:mingtaoding@163.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献43

  • 1杨晓光,王传胜,盛科荣.基于自然和人文因素的中国欠发达地区类型划分和发展模式研究[J].中国科学院研究生院学报,2006,23(1):97-104. 被引量:17
  • 2赵曦,李玉珍.乌蒙山区扶贫开发的现状、问题及对策[J].农村经济,2006(2):38-42. 被引量:9
  • 3王传胜,杨晓光,赵海英,樊杰.长江金沙江段生态屏障建设的功能区划——以昭通市为例[J].山地学报,2007,25(3):309-316. 被引量:13
  • 4杜瑜,王传胜,赵海英,杨晓光.生态屏障约束下的综合功能区划研究——以云南省昭通市为例(英文)[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences.2007(03)
  • 5Kijko A, Retief S J P, Graham G. Seismic hazard and risk assessment for Tulbagh, South Africa: Part II-Assessment of seismic risk[J]. Natural Hazards, 2003, 30(1): 25-41.
  • 6Koravos G, Tsapanos T, Bejaichund M. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Japan[J]. Pure and Applied Geophys- ics, 2006, 163(1): 137-151.
  • 7Silva V, Crowley H, Varum H, et al. Seismic risk assessment for mainland Portugal[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineer- ing, 2015, 13(2): 429-457.
  • 8Vahdat K, Smith N J, Amiri G G. Fuzzy multicriteria for developing a risk management system in seismically prone areas[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2014, 48(4): 235-248.
  • 9KASPERSON J, R KASPERSON, B L TURNER, et al.Vulnerability to global environmental change[ M].KASPERSON J, R KASPERSON. The social contours of risk (Volume II: risk analysis, corporations & the globalization of risk). Lomtnn: Earthscan, 2005: 245-285.
  • 10CUTYER S L, J T MITCHELL, M S SCOTF. Revealing the vulnerability of people and places : a case study of Georgetown county, South Carolina[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2000, 90(4): 713-737.

共引文献74

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部