摘要
补充侦查作为一种初次侦查的补救性措施,其本应体现出收集证据的补充性和样态方面的例外性,可是我国刑事司法实践中却利用补充侦查措施作为案件期限的延长工具,导致实践中大量运用补充侦查,使被追诉人的权利受到侵害。建议从统一侦查阶段和审查起诉阶段的证据标准、规范补充侦查提纲、严格限制补充侦查措施的运用及提升办案人员的素养等方面努力,让补充侦查措施的性质回归本位。
Supplementary probe is a remedial measure for initial probe, which should include the supplementation of evi- dences and the exceptionality of samples. Nevertheless, in China＇s criminal justice practice, there exists the measure of supplementary probe as a means of extending the case duration. As a consequence, supplementary probe is frequently used in practice, hurting the rights of the accused. This paper suggests that the evidence standards for the probe stages and the examination and prosecution stages be unified, the supplementary probe outlines be standardized, and limited ac- cess be made to the measure of supplementary probe so that the qualities of staff members involved in the case concerned can be improved. In this way the original status of supplementary probe can be recovered.
出处
《贵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》
2017年第2期27-31,共5页
Journal of Guiyang University:Social Sciences
基金
2016年国家社科基金项目:"审判中心主义效力研究"(项目编号:16BFX071)
贵州省遵义市人民检察院2017年重点研究课题:"检察机关审查起诉环节补充侦查制度研究"(项目编号:ZJYKT201701)阶段性成果
关键词
补充侦查
证据裁判原则
排除非法证据
审判中心主义
supplementary probe
principle of trial by evidence
exclusion of illegal evidence
trial - centeredness
作者简介
杨正万（1966-）,男，侗族，贵州石阡人，贵州民族大学法制与民族地区发展研究中心及学报编辑部主任、博士生导师、教授、博士。主要研究方向：刑事诉讼法和证据法。
单鹏（1989-）,男，湖南攸县人，贵州民族大学法制与民族地区发展研究中心研究人员、硕士。主要研究方向：刑诉法。
