期刊文献+

多学科团队护理模式在肺癌患者中的应用效果 被引量:25

Application effect of multidisciplinary team nursing model in patients with lung cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨多学科团队在肺癌患者中的应用效果.方法 选取2013年10月-2016年9月笔者所在医院收治的肺癌患者104例,依据随机数表法分为观察组(多学科团队)和对照组(常规护理),比较两组患者的生活质量、并发症发生率及护理满意率.结果 观察组患者的神经炎、黏膜炎、咳嗽、呼吸困难、胸痛、肩背疼痛、咯血及其他部位疼痛评分均明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05).观察组52例,其中呼吸衰竭1例,心律失常1例,血栓1例,并发症总发生率为5.77%;对照组52例,其中呼吸衰竭2例,心律失常1例,肺部感染1例,血栓4例,并发症总发生率为15.38%.观察组满意率为98.08%,对照组满意率为80.77%.结论 多学科团队在肺癌患者的护理管理中具有明显优势,能够提高患者的生活质量,降低不良并发症的发生率. Objective To explore the effect of multidisciplinary team nursing model in patients with lung cancer.Methods Totally 104 patients with lung cancer admitted in Chongqing Three Gorges Central Hospital from October 2013 to September 2016 were selected and divided into the observation group (multidisciplinary team) and the control group (routine care) according to random number table method. The quality of life,the incidence of complications and nursing satisfaction between two groups were compared.Results In the observation group,the scores of neuritis,catarrh,cough,dyspnea,chest pain,shoulder pain,hemoptysis and pain in other parts were significantly lower than those of the control group (P〈0.05). Fifty-two cases in the observation group,there was one case of respiratory failure,one case of arrhythmia and one case of thrombosis, so the total incidence rate of complications was 5.77%;fifty-two cases in the control group,there was two cases of respiratory failure,one case of arrhythmia,one case of pulmonary infection and four cases of thrombosis,so the total incidence rate of complications was 15.38%. The satisfaction rate in the observation group was 98.08%, while in the control group,it was 80.77%.Conclusions Multidisciplinary team has obvious advantages in the nursing care of patients with lung cancer,and it can improve the quality of life of patients and reduce the incidence of adverse complications.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2017年第6期766-769,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 重庆市卫生局中医药科技项目(2012-2-176)
关键词 肺肿瘤 生活质量 多学科团队 并发症 Lung carcinoma Quality of life Multidisciplinary team Complications
作者简介 通信作者:魏大琼,Email:1255692252@qq.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献95

  • 1李亚玲,王耕,王明华,时云,王桂云.乳癌病人癌因性疲乏的评估与处理[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2004,19(10):3-5. 被引量:28
  • 2叶斌,赖瑞楠,王升晔,张苏展.晚期肺癌患者预后因素分析[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(9):2327-2329. 被引量:9
  • 3万崇华,陈明清,张灿珍,汤学良,孟琼,张晓磬.癌症患者生命质量测定量表EORTC QLQ-C30中文版评介[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2005,20(4):353-355. 被引量:1375
  • 4张作记.世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表.见中国行为医学科学编辑委员会编.行为医学量表手册.北京:中华医学电子音像出版社,2005.77-83,199-200,206-207.
  • 5Meiners S, Eickelberg O. What shall we do with the damaged proteins in lung diseases? Ask the proteasome! [J]. Eur Respir J, 2012[Epub ahead of print].
  • 6Sun Y, Wang J, Liu Y, et al. Results of phase Ⅲ trial of rhendostatin (YH-16) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients [J]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2005,23 ( 16 Suppl) :7138.
  • 7Fayers PM, Asronson NK, Bjordal K, et al. On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. The EORTC QLQ_-C30 scoringmanual. 3rd ed Brussels: EORTC, 2001.
  • 8Park S, Kim IR, Baek KK, et al. Prospective analysis of quality of life in elderly patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol, 2013, 24(6): 1630-1639.
  • 9Schulte T, S chniewind B, Walter J, et al. Age-related impairment of quality of life after lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 2010, 68(1): 115-120.
  • 10Cai YX, Fu XN, Xu Q.Z, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy versus open lobectomy in stage i non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e82366.

共引文献329

同被引文献219

引证文献25

二级引证文献265

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部