期刊文献+

基于潜在冲突的交叉点航路构型研究 被引量:2

Configuration Study of Air Route Intersection Based on Potential Conflicts
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 航路交叉点的承载能力是决定航路容量的关键因素,而研究交叉点的潜在冲突与航路构型是提高交叉点容量的有效方法。首先根据国内现有几大主要航路构型的运行现状,提出构型存在的主要问题并加以总结。然后建立基于影响航段的交叉航路冲突模型,分别讨论了航路交角、航班流率、安全间隔3方面对平均冲突数的影响。最后比较分流法和降维法两种扩容方法,通过容量模型和数值分析计算,把三维交叉航路降为二维简单交叉航路,把"米"字型航路改为"井"字型航路,验证了降维法更具有可行性。研究表明,"井"字型航路可以增大航路网的现有容量,是提高空域利用率和运行效率的有效方法。 mIntersection capacity is vital to air route capacity,and potential conflicts and configuration of intersection are important to enlarge the route capacity.A brief introduction of air route configurations operating in China were presented first including functions,pros and cons and main problems.Then the potential conflict model around the airway intersection was proposed by introducing the variables of the angle of air route,flows of aircraft along route 1 and 2 in aircraft per hour,and minimum lateral radar separation,which analyzes the relationship between the conflicts and variable above.Based on these,conclusion can be drawn that the change of the crossing angle has the function relationship with the conflicts;flows of aircraft along routes 1 and 2 has different influence about the number of conflicts.It also discusses two ways to adjust the structure of intersection,distributary and simplification.The result shown by MATLAB that it can reduce flight conflicts by adjusting the intersection geometry,which is an effective and feasible method to expand the capacity of the airway network and improve the operating efficiency.
出处 《航空计算技术》 2017年第1期81-84,89,共5页 Aeronautical Computing Technique
基金 中央高校基本科研业务经费专项资金项目资助(Y16-13)
关键词 航空运输 航路降维法 潜在冲突模型 交叉点航路构型 航路容量 “井”字型航路 air transportation dimension simplification method potential conflicts model air route configuration of intersection air route capacity "#" shaped route
作者简介 何琛(1992-),女,新疆乌鲁木齐人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为空域规划.
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献42

  • 1韩松臣,裴成功,隋东,左凌.平行区域导航航路安全性分析[J].航空学报,2006,27(6):1023-1027. 被引量:36
  • 2张兆宁,张晓燕,李冬宾.基于VOR导航的平行航路侧向碰撞率计算模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2007,7(3):21-24. 被引量:29
  • 3Reich P G. Analysis of long range air traffic systems: separation standards i[J]. Journal of the Institute of Navigation,1966,19 (1) :88-98.
  • 4Reich P G. Analysis of long range air traffic systems: separation standards ii [J]. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 1966,19 (2) :169 -186.
  • 5Reich P G. Analysis of long range air traffic systems: separation standards iii[J]. Journal of the Institute of Navigation,1966,19 (3):331-347.
  • 6Doc 9689-AN/953. Manual on airspace planning methodology for the determination of separation minima [S] Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization 1998.
  • 7Brooker P. Aircraft collision risk in the North Atlantic region[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1984, 35(8) :695 -703.
  • 8Cox M E, Harrison D, Moek G, et al. European studies to investigate the feasibility of using 1000 ft vertical separation minima above FL 290, parts i[J]. Journal of Institute of Navigation, 1991, 44 (2): 171-183.
  • 9Cox M E, Harrison D, Moek G, et al. European studies to investigate the feasibility of using 1000 ft vertical separation minima above FL 290, parts ii[J]. Journal of Institute of Navigation,1992, 45 (1): 91-106.
  • 10Cox M E, Harrison D, Moek G, et al. European studies to investigate the feasibility of using 1000 ft vertical separation minima above FL 290, parts iii[J]. Journal of Institute of Navigation,1993, 46 (2): 245-261.

共引文献35

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部