高端业务对人力资源服务企业效益影响研究被引量：2

Research on High-end Service Effect of Human Resource Service Corporations' Performance:Based on Propensity Score Matching and Official Statistical Application

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要人力资源服务业是服务业中的"朝阳产业",属于生产性服务业,它的高速发展促进了各行各业人力资源的优化配置,产生显著的溢出效应已成为现代服务业新的增长点,同时人力资源服务企业的发展状况及其统计信息也已成为社会各界广泛关注的问题和需求。通过问卷调查方式收集的人力资源服务企业数据,可分析样本企业的基本现状,基于此数据可将该领域的研究从行业层面推进到业务类型层面,并采用倾向得分匹配方法研究人力资源服务高端业务对企业效益的影响,研究结果表明开展高端业务的企业比未开展高端业务企业的销售利润率高1.97个百分点。 Human resource service industry is a promising part of service industry which belongs to the productive service industry.The high speed development of this industry contributes to the allocation of human resources and produces significant spillovers.This paper use data collected by sample survey to study how the high-end business type influence the corporations＇ performance.We used propensity score matching method to conduct this research and the results show：corporations which have high-end business type have better performance and the ratio of income as a percentage of sales is 1.97 percent higher.

作者王文静

机构地区中国人民大学统计学院

出处《统计与信息论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第2期96-102,共7页 Journal of Statistics and Information

基金中国人民大学重大基础研究计划<政府统计国际规范及中国应用研究>(2112011164)

关键词人力资源服务企业高端业务传统业务倾向得分匹配 human resource service high end service traditional service propensity score matching method

分类号 F270.3 [经济管理—企业管理]

作者简介王文静,女,河北石家庄人,博士生,研究方向：经济社会统计,政府统计.

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献5

1董小华.加快首都人力资源服务业产业化发展[J].中国人力资源开发,2012,29(2):97-100. 被引量：8
2刘凤芹,马慧.倾向得分匹配方法的敏感性分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2009,24(10):7-13. 被引量：18
3韩树杰.我国人力资源服务业的发展现状与趋势[J].中国人力资源开发,2008,25(1):92-95. 被引量：28
4刘建平,梁敏.数量特征敏感问题问卷设计[J].统计与信息论坛,2016,31(4):13-16. 被引量：6
5来有为,袁东明.我国人力资源服务业的发展状况、问题及政策建议[J].生产力研究,2014(2):89-93. 被引量：23

二级参考文献30

1耿直.观察性研究与混杂因素[J].统计与信息论坛,2004,19(5):13-17. 被引量：8
2Rosenbaum P, Rubin D. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects[J]. Biometrika, 1983(70) :41 - 55.
3Johar M. The impact of the Indonesian health card program: a matching estimator approach[J ]. [ 2009- 03 - 10 ]. Journlal of Health Economics, 2008doi: 10. 1016/j. jhealeco. 2008.10. 001.
4Perkins S M, Tu W, Underhill M G, et al. The use of propensity scores in pharmacoepidemiologic research [J ]. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety,2000(9) :93 - 101.
5Heckman James J. Econometric causality[J]. International Statistical Review, 2008(1) : 1 -27.
6Smith Jeffrey A, Todd Petra E. Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators[J ]. Journal of Econometrics, 2005 (125) : 305 - 353.
7Dehejia R, Wahba S. Propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002(1) : 151 - 161.
8Rubin D B. For objective causal inference: design trumps analysis[J]. The Annual of Applied Atatistics, 2008(3) :808 - 840.
9Heckman James J. The Scientic model of causality[J]. Sociological Methodology, 2005(1):1 -97.
10Rubin D. Causal inference using potential outcomes: design, modeling, decisions[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2005 (100) : 322 - 331.