期刊文献+

基于CFD桥梁典型断面三分力系数差异研究 被引量:2

Study on Difference of Typical Section of Three Component Coefficients Based on CFD Bridge
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究桥梁的抗风性能时,三分力系数可影响分析精度,在研究桥梁抗风性能时常采用风洞试验进行桥梁气动稳定的测试工作,但采用此种方法测试时需要较长的周期及较高费用,加之难以实现流动可视化,导致其应用受到一定限制。随着CFD方法的发展,使风洞试验被替换成为可能,尽管风动试验不能被CFD方法完全取代,但仍可提升抗风性能分析的精确性。文章首先分析了桥梁抗风分析时仅应用抗风设计规范存在的局限性,接着介绍了CFD及其在桥梁工程中应用的必要性,最后分析了基于CFD桥梁典型断面三分力系数差异。 The study on wind resistant performance of the bridge, a parameter analysis accuracy for three component coefficients, so far, the test work still stable bridge gas by using wind tunnel test, but the test method requires a relatively long cycle and high cost, and difficult to achieve flow visualization, leading to its application limited.With the development of CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) method of development, make the wind tunnel test was replaced as possible, although the wind cannot be completely replace the CFD test method, but the accuracy of the approval to increase the wind resistance analysis.In this paper, firstly analyzes the limitations of the bridge wind resistance analysis only application of wind resistant design code exists, then introduces the necessity of CFD and its application in bridge engineering, finally analyzes the difference between the typical section of the three component coefficients based on CFD bridge.
作者 王锋 赖笑
出处 《建筑技术开发》 2017年第1期131-132,共2页 Building Technology Development
关键词 CFD 桥梁断面 三分力系数 差异分析 CFD : bridge section : three component coefficient difference analysis
作者简介 王锋(1984-),男,湖北天门人,讲师,主要研究方向为土木工程专业的教学。
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1邓文,葛耀君,曹丰产.桥梁闭口箱梁三分力数值识别中的湍流模型比选[J].上海公路,2006(4):36-40. 被引量:11
  • 2[5]JTG D62-2004,公路钢筋混凝土及预应力混凝土桥涵设计规范[S].2004.
  • 3JTG/TD60一01-2004,公路桥梁设计抗风规范[S].
  • 4Zdravkovich M M. Review of flow interference between two cylinders in various arrangement[ J]. Journal of Fluids Engi- neering, 1977, 99 : 618 - 633.
  • 5Matsumoto M, Shiraishi N, Shirato H. Aerodynamic instabili- ties of twin circular cylinders [ J ]. Journal of Wind Engineer- ing and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1990, 33 : 91 - 100.
  • 6Alam M. M. , Zhou Y. Strouhal numbers, forces and flow structures around two tandem cylinders of different diameters [ J ]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2008, 24:505 - 526.
  • 7LIU Xian-zhi, Marc L. Nikitopoulos dimitris, wind tunnel tests for mean drag and lift coefficients on multiple circular cylinders arranged in-line [ J ]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96:831-839.
  • 8Sumner D, Riehards M D, Akosile O O. Strouhal number da- ta for two staggered circular cylinders [ J ]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96:859 - 871.
  • 9Rowan A I, Stoyan S, Xie J M, et al. Tacoma narrows 50 years later wind engineering investigations for parallel bridges [ J ]. Bridge Structures : Assessment, Design and construc- tion, 2005, 1(1) : 3 -17.
  • 10Akihiro H, Naruhito S, Masaru M, et al. , Aerodynamic sta- bility of kansai international airport access bridge [ J ]. Jour-nal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1993, 49 ( 1 - 3 ) : 533 - 542.

共引文献49

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部