期刊文献+

3.0T磁共振体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像鉴别诊断脊柱不典型血管瘤与溶骨性转移瘤 被引量:10

Differential diagnosis of spinal osteolytic metastases from atypical hemangiomas using introvoxel incoherent motion at 3.0T MRI
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨3.0T MR体素内不相干运动(IVIM)成像对脊柱不典型血管瘤与溶骨性转移瘤的鉴别诊断价值。方法回顾性收集18例脊柱不典型血管瘤患者(19个病灶)和25例脊柱转移瘤患者(69个病灶)。对所有患者均行3.0T MR扫描,包括常规序列和IVIM DWI序列,采用单指数模型后处理软件获得ADC值,采用双指数模型后处理软件获得IVIM参数,包括慢速扩散系数(ADCslow值)、快速扩散系数(ADCfast值)及快速扩散分数(f值)。采用独立样本t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验比较各参数值的差异。结果脊柱不典型血管瘤和转移瘤的ADC值分别为(1.16±0.30)×10^(-3) s/mm^2、(0.80±0.27)×10^(-3) s/mm^2,差异有统计学意义(t=5.00,P<0.001);ADCslow中位数分别为0.78×10^(-3) s/mm^2、0.55×10^(-3) s/mm^2,差异有统计学意义(P=0.02);ADCfast分别为(63.06±33.89)×10^(-3) s/mm^2、(70.78±39.62)×10^(-3) s/mm^2,差异无统计学意义(t=0.77,P=0.44);f分别为(40.65±14.75)%、(32.49±11.50)%,差异有统计学意义(t=2.57,P=0.01)。结论 IVIM可定量评估脊柱不典型血管瘤和溶骨性转移瘤的水分子扩散及微血管灌注特性,ADC、ADCslow值对脊柱不典型血管瘤和溶骨性转移瘤具有一定的鉴别诊断价值。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic performance of introvoxel incoherent motion(IVIM)at 3.0T MR for distinguishing spinal metastases and atypical hemangiomas.Methods The retrospective study was performed of 18 patients with 19 spinal atypical hemangiomas and 25 patients with 69 spinal metastases.Conventional MR imaging and IVIM imaging were acquired at 3.0T MR scanner.The IVIM parameters including ADC value obtained by single exponential model,ADCslow,ADCfast,and fraction of ADCfast(f)obtained by bio exponential model of spinal lesions were calculated by using the ADC analysis software.All IVIM parameters between spinal metastases and atypical hemangiomas were analyzed by using t test or Mann-Whitney Utest.Results The ADC value of spinal metastases([0.80±0.27]×10^(-3) s/mm^2)was significantly lower than that of spinal atypical hemangiomas([1.16±0.30]×10^(-3) s/mm^2;t=5.00,P〈0.001);the ADCslowof spinal atypical hemangiomas and metastases were 0.78×10^(-3) s/mm^2 and 0.55×10^(-3)s/mm^2 respectively(P=0.02);the ADCfaswere not significantly different between spinal metastases([70.78±39.62]×10^(-3) s/mm^2)and atypical hemangiomas([63.06±33.89]×10^(-3) s/mm^2;t=0.77,P=0.44);the f of spinal atypical hemangiomas was(40.65±14.75)% and that of metastases was(32.49±11.50)%(t=2.57,P=0.01).Conclusion IVIM imaging can quantitatively evaluate the characteristics of perfusion and diffusion in spinal metastases and atypical hemangiomas.ADC and ADCsloware suitable for identification of atypical hemangiomas and osteolytic metastases.
作者 史燕杰 李晓婷 张晓燕 刘玉良 孙应实 SHI Yanjie LI Xiaoting ZHANG Xiaoyan LIU Yuliang SUN Yingshi(Department of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Carcinognenesis and Translational Research E Ministry of Education ~ , Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China)
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第2期276-280,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81471640 81371715)
关键词 脊柱 血管瘤 肿瘤转移 不相干运动 扩散磁共振成像 Spine Hemangiomas Neoplasm metastasis Introvoxel incoherent motion Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
作者简介 史燕杰(1981),男,山西武乡人,博士,主治医师。研究方向:肿瘤影像学。Email:shiyanjie-2008@163.com [通信作者]孙应实,北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所医学影像科恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室,100142。Email:sys27@163.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献65

  • 1King AD, Vlantis AC, Tsang RK, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2006,27 : 1288 -1291.
  • 2Sumi M, Sakihama N, Sumi T, et al. Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003,24 : 1627-1634.
  • 3Razek AA, Megahed AS, Denewer A, et al. Role of diffusion- weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation between the viable and necrotic parts of head and neck tumors. Acta Radiol, 2008,49:364-370.
  • 4King AD, Ahuja AT, Yeung DK, et al. Malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MRimaging. Radiology, 2007,245 : 806 -813.
  • 5Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology, 1988,168:497-505.
  • 6Luciani A, Vignaud A, Cavet M, et al. Liver cirrhosis : intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging-pilot study. Radiology, 2008,249 : 891-899.
  • 7Patel J, Sigmund EE, Rusinek H, et al. Diagnosis of cirrhosis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI and dynamic contrast- enhanced MRI alone and in combination:preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging,2010,31:589-600.
  • 8Sumi M, Nakamura T. Head and neck tumors: assessment of perfusion-related parameters and diffusion coefficients based on the intravoxel incoherent motion model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2013,34:410-416.
  • 9Lu Y, Jansen JF, Mazaheri Y, et al. Extension of the intravoxel incoherent motion model to non-gaussian diffusion in head and neck cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2012,36 : 1088-1096.
  • 10Riches SF, Hawtin K, Charles-Edwards EM, et al. Diffusion- weighted imaging of the prostate and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modelled diffusion and associated perfusion coefficients. NMR Biomed, 2009, 22 : 318-325.

共引文献149

同被引文献89

引证文献10

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部