摘要
语言的主观性研究存在认知语法和语义——语用两大取向。文章评述了两种取向的基本研究框架,并通过具体案例探寻两者的区别;梳理了共时主观化与历时主观化的研究侧重点,通过具体案例探讨了两者在主观化形式鉴别上的争议及两者对交互主观化的不同认识;探析了主观化与语法化的关系;最后归纳了两大取向的相通之处、对汉语研究的启示及有待进一步研究的问题。
There are the two approaches on the study of the linguistic subjectivity:cognitive and semantic-pragmatic.The paper explores the basic research framework of the two approaches,and analyzes their differences through concrete examples.The research focus of the synchronic and the diachronic subjectification is reviewed,and disputes and arguments about the operationalizing of subjectification and the identification of the intersubjectification are discussed as well.The paper comments the relationship between the subjectification and the grammaticalization.Finally,the commonalities of the two approaches are summarized in order to offer some inspiration to the Chinese studies.
出处
《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期124-132,共9页
Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家留学基金委课题"面向预科汉语教学的现代汉语副词主观化研究"([2013]4482-A)
同济大学青年基金项目"语篇背景下现代汉语副词语义--语用接口研究"(2750219021)
关键词
主观化
交互主观化
认知语法
语义语用
语法化
subjectification
intersubjectification
the cognitve grammar
semantic-pragmatic interact
grammaticalization
作者简介
潘海峰,山东潍坊人,博士,同济大学国际文化交流学院,主要从事现代汉语语法、虚词及汉外语言对比研究。