摘要
"68运动"失败以后,激进知识分子对马克思以阶级斗争为手段在发达国家争取革命解放的理论假设产生了怀疑,西方马克思主义者普遍开辟了意识形态批判和文化批判理论范式。面对新的时代症侯,单纯的意识形态批判只能是隔靴搔痒,并没有找到问题的根源所在。列斐伏尔的空间政治经济学批判恰恰是对这一现状的扭转,为改变这一现状提供了可能。而当前研究者一般都只把主要目光停留在列斐伏尔日常生活异化批判和空间意识形态批判这些方面,忽视了列斐伏尔对马克思主义政治经济学批判的发展。列斐伏尔在对马克思政治经济学批判的重新挖掘中,提出了不同于19世纪商品生产问题框架的空间生产框架,并从分中离出了一门空间政治经济学。他认为,从"空间中的生产"转变到"空间本身的再生产"是资本主义得以绵延存续的最重要的原因。他在将视角转向城市社会学和经济学研究过程之中实现了社会批判理论的空间转向,为马克思主义研究范式今日之创新作出了应有贡献。
After the failure of ＂the 68 movement,＂ Marx′s theory of class struggle in developed countries to fight for revolutionary liberation has been suspected by radical intellectuals.Western Marxists generally had developed theoretical paradigms of ideological criticism and cultural criticism.Facing problems in the new era,pure ideological criticism just attempted an ineffective solution,being unable to find the root of the problem.Lefebvre′s critique of spatial political economy reversed the situation,providing the possibility of breaking this vicious circle.And many researchers just focus on the alienation critique of Lefebvre′s daily life and the ideological critique of space,ignoring Lefebvre′s development of Marx′s critique of political economy.In re-excavation of Marxist critique of political economy,Lefebvre put forward a framework for spatial production different from commodity production framework of 19 th century,from which Lefebvre separated and created a science of spatial political economy.The shift from ＂the production in space＂ to the ＂reproduction of space itself＂ is the most important reason for the continuous existence of capitalism.Lefebvre turned his forcus to urban sociology and economics research and his thoughts activated the spatial turn of social critical theory,making great contributions to the innovation of Marxism research paradigm today.
出处
《江苏科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2016年第3期13-20,共8页
Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
作者简介
作者简介：鲁宝（1990一），男，河南信阳人，南京大学博士研究生，主要从事西方马克思主义哲学与空间理论研究。
