期刊文献+

科研经费腐败的社会网络分析 被引量:3

Social Network Analysis of Corruption of R&D Fund
原文传递
导出
摘要 科研经费的腐败是当代中国社会腐败的一个重要方面。本文引入社会网络分析方法,以Z大学陈某科研经费腐败案为案例,通过分析基于科研经费而形成的这一特定社会网络下各利益主体之间的合谋关系,发现不同参与主体在该合谋网络中占据不同的位置和控制力,包括主导整个网络的核心位置主体、占据"信息利益"和"控制利益"优势的结构洞位置主体以及为集体腐败提供帮助扮演桥梁作用的主体,在此基础上对该合谋网络进行更深层次的探究,分析了人情因素在该网络中所呈现出的工具性和情感性相容的特征,并总结当下科研经费腐败过程中暴露出的一些新型特征,旨在为预防和惩治科研经费腐败提供借鉴。 Corruption of research funding is an important aspect of contemporary Chinese society of corruption. This paper introduces social network analy- sis methods to Z university research funding corruption case of Chen case, by analyzing the relationship between the various stakeholders in collusion this particular research funding based on social networks formed between different participants found the conspiracy network occupy different positions and con- trol, including the dominant position of the main core of the entire network, to occupy the position of the main structural holes " information of interest" and "controlling interest" advantage of playing bridge and provide help for the collective body of corruption, on this basis, the conspiracy network for a deeper inquiry, analysis of the human factor in the network by showing instrumental and emotional compatibility features, and summarizes the current re- search funding process exposed corruption in some of the new features, designes to prevent and punish corruption of research funding for reference.
作者 张晓冰
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第10期50-55,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 科研经费 社会网络分析 research funding social network analysis
作者简介 张晓冰(1990-),女,河北石家庄人,中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院硕士研究生,主要研究方向:科技政策与管理。
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献11

  • 1王光远.管理审计理论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1996.
  • 2Della Summers. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English [M]. Essex: Longman Group UK Limited, 1995.
  • 3Jay.M.Shafritz. International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration [M]. NewYork: Facts on File Publications, 1998. 6.
  • 4Martin Trow. On Accountability of Higher Education in the United States [A ]. William G. Bowen. University and Their Leadership [C]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.2.
  • 5Pual Davenport. Honesty, Accountability and Trust: Fostering Research Integrity In Canada [R]. Montreal: Canadian Science Policy Confer- ence, 2010. 137.
  • 6凯尔森 沈宗灵译.法与国家的一般理论[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996.109.
  • 7联合国教科文组织国际教育发展委员会.学会生存[M].教育科学出版社,1996.200.
  • 8Donald P. Ely computer in school & Universities in to U. S. A Educational Technology/sept. 1993.
  • 9唐·泰普斯科特.数字化成长[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,1999,203.
  • 10[5][6][美]嘉格伦.网络教育21世纪的教育革命[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.5,184,206,217,203,217.

共引文献227

同被引文献54

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部