期刊文献+

ADC值对宫颈癌的诊断价值及其与临床病理因素的关系 被引量:9

The diagnostic value of ADC values of cervical cancer and the relationship with clinicopathological factors
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析ADC值对宫颈癌的诊断价值,探讨宫颈癌ADC值与临床病理因素的关系。方法:46例宫颈癌患者术前行3.0 T MRI常规扫描及DWI检查,20例成年健康女性志愿者作为对照组行DWI。比较宫颈癌与正常宫颈全层、内膜层、结合带、肌层ADC值。分析宫颈癌ADC值与肿瘤体积、病理分级、病理类型、临床分期的关系。结果:宫颈癌ADC值为(0.924±0.110)×10^(-3)mm^2/s,低于正常宫颈全层ADC值(1.626±0.242)×10^(-3)mm^2/s、内膜层ADC值(1.590±0.311)×10^(-3)mm^2/s、结合带ADC值(1.361±0.203)×10^(-3)mm^2/s、肌层(1.911±0.305)×10^(-3)mm^2/s(均P<0.05)。肌层ADC值最高,内膜次之,结合带最低,两两比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。宫颈鳞癌ADC值(0.927±0.113)×10^(-3)mm^2/s与腺癌ADC值(0.856±0.093)×10^(-3)mm^2/s比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Ⅰb~Ⅱa期宫颈癌ADC值为(0.932±0.118)×10-3 mm2/s,Ⅱb~Ⅳ期为(0.920±0.109)×10-3 mm2/s,两者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。宫颈癌ADC值与肿瘤体积无相关性(P>0.05),与肿瘤病理学分级呈负相关(r=-0.473,P=0.026)。低分化宫颈癌ADC值为(0.805±0.065)×10^(-3)mm^2/s,低于中/高分化组宫颈癌ADC值(0.952±0.099)×10^(-3)mm^2/s(t=-2.938,P=0.008)。结论:ADC值测量有助于鉴别宫颈癌和正常宫颈组织,宫颈癌ADC值在一定程度上可反映肿瘤分化程度。 Objective:The aim of this study was to determine whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements had any contribution in differentiation of normal cervix from cervical cancer ,and to analyze the relationships between the ADC value of tumor and the clinicopathological factors. Methods:Forty six patients with cervical cancer and 20 female healthy vol-unteers were included in this study. Preoperative MRI examinations were performed at a GE 3.0T MR scanner. The ADC value of tumor was compared with that of the normal cervix. We investigated whether there was a correlation between the mean ADC values and tumor volume,histologic type,pathologic grade and stage in malignant lesions. Results:Cervical cancer lesion demon-strated obviously hyperintensity on DWI images,and the mean ADC value of tumor (0.924±0.110)×10^-3 mm^2/s was statistically lower than that of cervical whole layer (1.626 ±0.242) ×10^-3 mm^2/s,endometrium (1.590 ±0.311) ×10^-3 mm^2/s,conjunctive zone (1.361±0.203)×10^-3 mm^2/s and muscular layer(1.911±0.305)×10^-3 mm^2/s (P〈0.05). There was no significant difference between the ADC of squamous carcinoma and that of adenocarcinoma ,and between the ADC ofⅠb~Ⅱa and that of Ⅱb~Ⅳ(P〉0.05). The mean ADC value of poorly differentiated tumors (0.805±0.065)×10^-3 mm^2/s was statistically lower than that of well/moderately differentiated tumors (0.952±0.099)×10^-3 mm^2/s (P〈0.05). The ADC value of uterine cervical cancer correlated negatively with the grading of tumor (r=-0.473,P=0.026). The value of cervical cancer was not correlated with tumor volume (P〉0.05). Conclusion:ADC measurement has a potential ability to differentiate between cancer and the normal cervical tissue. The ADC value of uterine cervical cancer correlates negatively with the grading of tumor ,thus providing a new method for e-valuating the pathologic grading of tumor.
出处 《中国中西医结合影像学杂志》 2016年第5期520-523,526,共5页 Chinese Imaging Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
关键词 磁共振成像 弥散 表观弥散系数 宫颈肿瘤 病理学 临床 Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging Apparent diffusion coefficient Uterine cervical neoplasms Pathology,clinical
作者简介 [通信作者]杜汉旺,E-mail:jiafeng2010@sina.com.
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献72

  • 1孙建衡.子宫颈癌治疗的回顾与展望[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(2):159-160. 被引量:21
  • 2刘妍,夏黎明,邹明丽,王承缘.磁共振扩散加权成像及ADC值测量在淋巴结病变鉴别诊断中的价值[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(5):730-732. 被引量:47
  • 3张赟,梁碧玲,高立,叶瑞心,沈君,钟镜联.正常子宫颈和宫颈癌的弥散加权成像特点[J].癌症,2007,26(5):508-512. 被引量:48
  • 4OKAMOTO Y,TANAKA Y O,NISHIDA M,et al.MR imaging of the uterine cervix:imaging pathologic correlation[J].Radiographics,2003,23 (2):425-445.
  • 5MCVEIGH P Z,SYED A M,MILOSEVIC M,et al.Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer[J].Eur Radiol,2008,18(5):1058-1064.
  • 6ROTH Y,TICHLER T,KOSTENICH G,et al.High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for pretreatment prediction and early monitoring of tumor response to therapy in mice[J].Radiology,2004,232(3):685-692.
  • 7KING A D,AHUJA A T,YEUNG D K,et al.Malignant cervical lymphadenopathy:diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MR imaging[J].Radiology,2007,245(3):806-813.
  • 8Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K, et al. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Malignant Breast Tumors: The Usefulness of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient(ADC) Value and ADC Map for the Detection of Malignant Breast Tumors and Evaluation of Cancer Extension [J]. Comput Assist Tomogr, 2005, 29: 644.
  • 9Guo AC, Cummings TJ, Dash RC, et al. Lymphoms and high-grad astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics[J]. Radiology, 2002;224: 177-183.
  • 10Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, etal. Biffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression(DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display [J]. Radiat Med, 2004, 22(4): 275 282.

共引文献175

同被引文献85

引证文献9

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部