期刊文献+

精神病态自评量表(简版)在中国大学生中的信效度检验 被引量:6

Reliability and Validity of the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale-Short form in Chinese University Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:引进Paulhus等编制的精神病态自评量表(简版),在中国大学生样本中进行中文版信效度检验。方法:采取整群取样的方法对478名大学生进行集体施测,选取黑暗三联征简版量表、冷酷无情特质量表、UPPS冲动行为量表和人格诊断问卷作为效度指标。结果:项目分析结果显示量表条目有较好同质性和区分度;量表四因素结构的拟合指数良好;量表总分与各维度得分相关系数在0.32-0.81之间;量表聚合效度的相关系数绝对值在0.14-0.55之间(P〈0.01);各个分量表的内部一致性系数在0.45-0.80之间。结论:精神病态自评量表(简版)中文版具有较好信效度,可以作为精神病态测量的有效工具。 Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale-Short Form in Chinese university students. Methods: A sample of 478 students completed the revised scale. The criteria were the Short Dark Triad, Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits, UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale and Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire. Results: The item analysis indicated good homogeneity and discrimination of the items; The fit indices of the four factors structure of the revised scale were good; The correlation coefficients between the dimensions and the whole inventory were ranged from 0.32 to 0.81; The correlation analyses indicated that the revised scale had good convergent validity that the absolute value of the correlation coefficients were ranged from 0.14 to 0.55(P〈0.01); The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the factors were ranged from 0.45 to 0.80. Conclusion: The Self-Report Psychopathy Scale-Short Form-Chinese Version is a reliable and valid instrument, and can be used to measure the level of psychopathy.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期658-662,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目(14AZD111)
关键词 精神病态 因素分析 信度 效度 Psychopathy Factor Analysis Reliability Validity
作者简介 通讯作者:程诚,Email:chengpsy@tju.edu.cn 通讯作者:杨丽,Email:yangli@tju.edu.cn;
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Hare RD, Neumann CS. Psychopathy: Assessment and fore- nsic implications. Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfac- ing Law, Psychiatry and Philosophy, 2010. 93-123.
  • 2Coid J, Yang M, Ullrich S, et al. Prevalence and correlates of psychopathic traits in the household population of Great Britain. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2009, 32(2): 65-73.
  • 3Gray NS, Snowden RJ. Psychopathy in women: Prediction of criminality and violence in UK and USA psychiatric patients resident in the community. Psychiatry Research, 2016, 237: 339-343.
  • 4Olver ME, Neumann CS, Wong SCP, et al. The structural and predictive properties of the Psychopathy Checklist- Revised in Canadian Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal offend-ers. Psychological Assessment, 2013, 25(1): 167.
  • 5Hare RD. A research scale for the assessment of psychopa- thy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Dif- ferences, 1980, 1(2): 111-119.
  • 6Hare RD. The Hare psychopathy checklist-revised: Manual. Multi-Health Systems, Incorporated, 1991.
  • 7Hare RD. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toron- to: Muhi-Health Systems, 2003.
  • 8Hart SD, Cox DN, Hare RD. Manual for the psychopathy checklist: Screening version(PCL: SV). Toronto: Multi- Health Systems, 1995.
  • 9Hare RD, Harpur TJ, Hemphill JF. Scoring pamphlet for the Self-Report Psychopathy scale: SRP-II. Unpublished Docu- ment, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada, 1989.
  • 10Neumann CS, Schmitt DS, Carter R, et al. Psychopathic traits in females and males across the globe. Behavioral Sci- ences & the Law, 2012, 30(5): 557-574.

二级参考文献39

  • 1杨会芹,姚树桥,朱熊兆,Randy P. Auerbach,John R. Z. Abela,XI Tong.Barratt冲动量表中文版用于中学生的信度、效度分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(1):4-6. 被引量:39
  • 2Paulhus DL, Williams KM. The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psyehopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 2002, 36:56-563.
  • 3Hodson G, Hogg SM, MacInnis CC. The role of "dark per- sonalities" (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), big five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejud- ice. Journal of research in Personality, 2009, 43:686-690.
  • 4Furnham A, Richards SC, Paulhus DL. The dark triad of personality: a 10 year review. Social and Personality Psycho- logv Compass, 2013, 7(3): 199-216.
  • 5Geng YG, Qin BB, Xia D, Ye QQ. Reliability and validity of the kiddie Mach scale in Chinese children. Psychological Reports, 2011, 108(1): 229-238.
  • 6Jonason PK, Webster GD. The Dirty Dozen: A concise mea- sure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 2010, 22: 420-432.
  • 7Paulhus DL, Jones DN. Introducing a short measure of the Dark Triad. In Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, 2011.
  • 8Maples JL, Lamkin J, Miller JD. A test of two brief measures of the Dark Triad: the Dirty Dozen and Short Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 2014, 16(1): 326-331.
  • 9Jonason PK, Luevano VX, Adama HM. How the dark triad traits predict relationship choices. Personality and Individu- al Differences, 2012, 53:180-184.
  • 10Jonason PK, Krause L. The emotional deficits associated with the Dark Triad Traits: Cognitive empathy, affective em- pathy and alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differenc- es, 2013, 55:532-537.

共引文献280

同被引文献42

引证文献6

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部