期刊文献+

美丽的谎言:女性主义视角下的网红经济批判 被引量:2

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在新浪微博主办的线下超级红人盛典上,女性网红一经亮相便成为全场关注吐槽的重点。针对这些"整容脸",大众总是倾向于将该现象简单归因于其自身的三观问题并对之嗤之以鼻。但究其根本,这种成风的社会现象背后,笔者认为这不仅与媒介的推波助澜紧密相关,更是父权制与资本运作下的牺牲品。为此,本文将基于女性主义的视角,从凝视的再升级、资本的产业运作、网红何去何从这三个角度对该现象展开具体阐述与进一步批判。
作者 郁丹霞
出处 《今传媒》 2016年第8期44-45,共2页 Today's Mass Media
作者简介 郁丹霞,女,北京交通大学语言与传播学院传播学专业,主要从事传播学研究.
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

  • 1James F. Hamilton, “Alternative Media: Conceptual Difficulties, Critical Possibilities,” Journal of Communication Inquiry, October, (2000).
  • 2Vincent Mosco, The Political Economy of Communication, London : Sage, 1996.
  • 3Anthony J. Cortese, Provocateur: Images of Women and Minorities in Advertising, Lanham, Maryland : Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.
  • 4Gaye Tuchman, Arlene Kaplan Daniels and James Benet, Hearth and Home :Images of Women in the Mass Media, New York: Oxford University Press, 1978, pp. 3 -38.
  • 5Kathryn Cirksena & Lisa Cuklanz,“Male is to Female As_is to _:A Guided Tour of Five Feminist Frameworks for Communication Studies,” in Lana F. Rakow (ed.), Women Making Meaning, New Feminist Directions in Communication, New York: Routledge, 1992, pp. 18 -44.
  • 6Liesbet van Zoonen, Feminist Media Studies, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi : Sage, 1994, pp. 29 - 34.
  • 7Liesbet van Zoonen, Feminist Media Studies, p. 44.
  • 8Lana F. Rakow and Laura A. Waekwitz (eds.), Feminist Communication Theory: Selections in Context, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2004, p. 9.
  • 9Marsha Houston, “The Politics of Difference: Race, Class, and Women's Communication,” in Lana F. Rakow (ed.), Women Making Meaning, New Feminist Directions in Communication, pp. 45 -59.
  • 10Sue Curry Jansen, Critical Communication Theory: Power, Media, Gender, and Technology, Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,2002, pp. 105 - 106.

共引文献92

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部