期刊文献+

Exploration of unpredictable environments by networked groups

Exploration of unpredictable environments by networked groups
原文传递
导出
摘要 Information sharing is a critical task for group-living animals. The pattern of sharing can be modeled as a network whose structure can affect the decision-making performance of individual members as well as that of the group as a whole. A fully connected network, in which each member can directly transfer information to all other members, ensures rapid sharing of important information, such as a promising foraging location. However, it can also impose costs by amplifying the spread of inaccur- ate information (if, for example the foraging location is actually not profitable). Thus, an optimal net- work structure should balance effective sharing of current knowledge with opportunities to discover new information. We used a computer simulation to measure how well groups characterized by dif- ferent network structures (fully connected, small world, lattice, and random) find and exploit resource peaks in a variable environment. We found that a fully connected network outperformed other struc- tures when resource quality was predictable. When resource quality showed random variation, however, the small world network was better than the fully connected one at avoiding extremely poor outcomes. These results suggest that animal groups may benefit by adjusting their informa- tion-sharing network structures depending on the noisiness of their environment.
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第3期207-214,共8页 动物学报(英文版)
关键词 agent-based model collective cognition CONFORMITY small world networks speed-accuracy trade-off. 网络结构 环境资源 群体生活 信息共享 小世界网络 工作结构 随机变化 计算机模拟
作者简介 Address correspondence to Takao Sasaki. E-mail: takao.sasaki@zoo.ox.ac.uk.
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献86

  • 1Barabasi AL, Albert R, 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286: 509-512.
  • 2Benvenuti S, Baldaccini NE, 1985. Pigeon orientation: A com- parison between single birds and small flocks. Ornis Stand. 16: 45-48.
  • 3Bergrnan G, Donner KO, 1964. An analysis of the spring migra- tion of the common scoter and the long-tailed duck in southern Finland. Acta Zool. Fenn. 105: 1-60.
  • 4Biro D, Sumpter DJT, Meade J, Guilford T, 2006. From compro- mise to leadership in pigeon homing. Curr. Biol. 16: 2123-2128.
  • 5Bode NWF, Faria JJ, Franks DW, Krause J, Wood, AJ, 2010. How perceived threat increases synchronization in collectively moving animal groups. Proc. R. Soe. B 277: 3065-3070.
  • 6Bode NWF, Franks DW, Wood AJ, 2011a. Limited interactions in flocks: Relating model simulations to empirical data. Proc. R. Soc. Interf. 8: 301-304.
  • 7Bode NWF, Wood AJ, Franks DW, 201lb. Social networks and models for collective motion in animals. Behav. Ecol. Socio- biol. 65: 117-130.
  • 8Bode NWF, Wood AJ, Franks DW, 2011c. The impact of social networks on animal collective motion. Anim. Behav. 82: 29-38.
  • 9Bode NWF, Franks DW, Wood AJ, 2012. Leading from the front? Social networks in navigating groups. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, doi:10.1007/s00265-012-1331-6.
  • 10Codling EA, Pitchford JW, Simpson SD, 2007. Group navigation and the "many-wrongs principle" in models of animal move- ment. Ecology 88:1864-1870.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部