期刊文献+

两种不同结缔组织移植技术在上前牙区即刻种植修复中的应用 被引量:8

Soft Tissue Augmentation for Immediate Implant Placement and Provisionalization in the Maxillary Anterior Area Using Two Different Methods:a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较带蒂结缔组织瓣移植(pedicle subepithelial connective tissue graft,PSCTG与游离结缔组织瓣移植(free subepithelial connective tissue graft,FSCTG)增厚种植体周围角化龈的量以达到稳定而良好的种植修复增量效果和美学效果。方法:29例满足即刻种植适应症的上前牙,拔出后即刻种植,同期采用PSCTG或FSCTG增加种植体周围软组织量,运用临时冠修复塑形,观察术后临床效果。结果:带蒂结缔组织瓣移植组(下文简称带蒂组)移植瓣成活率100%,游离结缔组织瓣移植(下文简称游离组)为93.33%。带蒂组移植后半年唇侧龈组织厚度(Facial gingival tissue thickness,FGTT)增加(1.572±0.74)mm,游离组增加(1.45±0.61)mm。移植1年时,带蒂组红色美学(the pink esthetic,PES)得分为(8.50±1.34)分,游离组(7.80±1.74)分,两组红色美学各指标评分差异无统计学意义。带蒂组PES达到6分及以上的比率高于游离组。结论:即刻种植(immediate implant placement and provisionalization,IIPP)联合PSCTG与联合FSCTG一样,短期唇侧龈厚度增量和红色美学效果均较好,而PSCTG由于自身血供更易成活固定。 Objective:The aim is to compare pedicle connective tissue grafts(PSCTG)with free subepithelial connective tissue grafts(FSCTG)in augmenting soft tissue to have good esthetic outcome in the anterior maxilla.Methods:Twenty-nine immediate implantations in the esthetic zone were randomly allocated to the PSCTG group or the FSCTG group.The clinical outcomes were observed.The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the PES score between 2groups.Results:The clinical survival rates were 100%and 93.33%for the group grafted with PSCTG and group grafted with FSCTG,respectively.The change of facial gingival tissue thickness was(1.57±0.74)mm and(1.45±0.61)mm.The PES score was 8.50±1.34 and 7.80±1.74,respectively.There was not significant difference between two groups.The aesthetically acceptable frequency for the PSCTG group was higher than that for the FSCTG group.Conclusion:Soft tissue augmentation for immediately single tooth implantation in the anterior maxilla was successfully performed using both techniques.The PSCTG was more likely to survive because of better blood supply.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期502-505,共4页 Journal of Oral Science Research
关键词 即刻种植修复 结缔组织移植 美学 Immediate implant placement and provisionalization Connective tissue graft Aesthetics
作者简介 王群(1989-),女,安徽人,硕士在读,主要从事口腔种植的临床治疗工作。 通讯作者吴海珍,电话:0551-65966576
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Cosyn J, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. Soft tissue preservation and pink aesthetics around single immediate implant restora- tions : a 1- year prospective study [J]. Clinical Implant Den- tistry and Related Research,2013,15(6) : 847-857.
  • 2Yoshino S, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Effects of connec-tive tissue grafting on the facial gingival level following single immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the es- thetic zone: a 1 - year randomized controlled prospective study [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29(2) : 432-440.
  • 3Lin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. Effects of currently available surgical and restorative interventions on reducing midfacial mueosal recession of immediately placed single-tooth im- plants: a systematic review [J]. J Periodontol, 2014, 85(1) : 92-102.
  • 4Lee A, Fu JH, Wang HL. Soft Tissue Biotype Affects Im- plant Success, 2011, 20(3) : e38-47.
  • 5Levine RA, Huynh-Ba G, Cochran DL. Soft tissue aug- mentation procedures for mucogingival defects in esthetic sites [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29 supp155 -185.
  • 6Zigdon H,Machtei EE. The dimentions of keratinized mucosa around implants affect clinical and immunological parameters [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,2008,19(4) :387-392.
  • 7Yoshino S, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Effects of connec- tive tissue grafting on the facial gingival level following single immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the es- thetic zone., a 1 - year randomized controlled prospective study [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29(2) : 432-440.
  • 8Migliorati M, Amorfini L, Signori A. Clinical and Aesthetic Outcome with Post- Extractive Implants with or without Soft Tissue Augmentation: A 2- Year Randomized Clinical Trial [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2013 Dec 27. doi: 10. 1111/cid. 12194.
  • 9Kim TH, Cascione D, Knezevie A. Simulatedtissue using a unique pontic design: a clinical report [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2009, 102: 205-210.
  • 10Mangano FG, Mangano C, Ricci M. Esthetic evaluation of single-tooth Morse taper connection implants placed in fresh extraction sockets or healed sites [J]. J Oral Implantol, 2013, 39(2) : 172-181.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Misje K, Bjornland T, Saxegaard E, et al. Treatment out- come of dental implants in the esthetic zone: a 12 to 15year retrospective study [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2013, 26(4) : 365 -369.
  • 2Man Y, Wang Y, Qu Y, et al. A palatal roll envelope tech- nique for peri-implant mucosa reconstruction: a prospective case series study [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2013,42(5) :660-665.
  • 3Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single implant treatment [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 1997, 17 : 327-333.
  • 4Htirzeler MB, von Mohrenschildt S, Zuhr O, et al. Stage- two implant surgery in the esthetic zone: a new technique [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2010, 30(2) : 187-93.
  • 5Tarnow DP, Scharf DR. Modified roll technique for localized alveolar ridge augmentation [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,1992,12 : 415-425.
  • 6Salama H, Salama MA, Garber D, et al. The interproximal height of bone: a guidepost to predictable aesthetic strategies and soft tissue contours in anterior tooth replacement [J]. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 1998, 10(9) : 113-141.
  • 7Tarnow DP, Wagner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the dis- tance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the pres- ence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla [J]. J Peri- odontol,1992, 63 : 995-996.
  • 8Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, et al. Evalution of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score [J]. Clin OralImplants,2005,16(8) : 639-644.

同被引文献47

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部