摘要
基于我国一审撤诉率的持续畸高、法院对于撤诉过于高涨的制度偏好以及被告在撤诉制度空间内应然权利的完全架空,应当根据我国撤诉制度的实践运行特征及制度理念对我国民事一审撤诉制度设置予以理性矫正。合理的思路是赋予原告从立案到判决生效前的完整撤诉申请权,创设被告对于原告申请撤诉的程序性对抗权,此外,应当明确法院对于撤诉事项的心证公开义务,以达致撤诉制度场域内的权利横平以及撤诉制度的正当化运行。
Based on persistently high rate of first instance civil withdrawal, the court’s obvious preference of civilwithdrawal application and complete negligence of the defendant’s rights in withdrawal, the present essay believes thatfirst instance civil withdrawal in China should be reasonaly rectified according to the practice and system ideas ofChinese withdrawal system. Reasonable thoughts include endowing the plaintiff with the right of withdrawalapplication during the period from the court, accepting the case to the verdict coming into force, creating the right ofwithdrawal agreement for the defendant, and clearing inner conviction disclosure obligations of the judge so as toachieve right balance in the withdrawal system field and proper operation of withdrawal system.
出处
《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2016年第2期51-60,共10页
Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences
基金
2015年国家社会科学基金国家级重大课题项目"审判中心视角下的刑事
民事和行政诉讼制度改革"(14ZDC014)
关键词
民事一审
撤诉
法官职权
当事人合意
first civil instance
accusation withdrawal
authority of judge
agreement both parties
作者简介
李潇潇（1989-）,男,宁夏中卫人,北京大学法学院博士研究生,主要研究方向：民事诉讼法
