摘要
由于我国《专利法》对专利间接侵权问题未进行体系性的规制,因此相应司法实践中"共同侵权"理论就成为最高人民法院指导专利间接侵权案件裁判的重要依据,但实际上专利间接侵权并非等同于共同侵权,此理论依据的不足导致了审判标准不一。通过国内外立法比较和论证专利间接侵权行为作为一项独立的专利侵权行为,并以此为前提,探讨了我国专利间接侵权制度的立法方向和模式。
Since China＇s ＂Patent Law＂does not set rules and regulations on indirect infringement of patent,the Supreme Court usually guides in addressing the patent indirect infringement case based on the theory of ＇contributory infringement＇ in the judicial practice. But in fact,the patent indirect infringement is not equal to contributory infringement,and the inadequacy of theoretical basis leads to different trial standards. The article makes a comparison of the relevant legislation home and abroad and tries to demonstrate that the patent indirect infringement is an independent patent infringement. Based on this premise,this paper deeply discusses the legislative direction and pattern of the patent indirect infringement system in China.
出处
《河南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2016年第1期23-28,共6页
Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition
基金
2014年国家社科基金年度项目(14BFX007)
关键词
专利间接侵权
专利侵权
归责原则
抗辩事由
indirect infringement of patent
patent infringement
doctrine of liability fixation
defense reason
作者简介
许浩明（1955-），男，安徽合肥人，博士，教授、博士生导师，中国政法大学欧盟法研究中心主任，德国明斯特大学、弗莱堡大学特聘客座教授，主要研究方向：国家商法。
