期刊文献+

右美托咪啶对淋巴水肿胸导管探查术患者全麻效应的影响 被引量:5

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨右美托咪啶对胸导管探查术患者全麻效应的影响。方法:住院患者40例,随机均分两组:一组为D组(右美托咪啶组,负荷量为0.8μg/kg,15 min内,维持量0.4μg/(kg·h);另一组为N组(生理盐水对照组)。比较两组患者麻醉用药,苏醒期质量,苏醒时间,不同时点心率、平均动脉压变化及围术期不良事件发生情况。结果:(1)D组患者术中丙泊酚、瑞芬用量及苏醒期躁动评分均明显低于N组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);睁眼时间、拔管时间及镇静评分,两组无统计学差异(P>0.05)。(2)两组患者平均动脉压比较:入室后(T1)、手术结束时(T4)及离室时(T6)两组间均无统计学差异(P>0.05),气管插管时(T2)、切皮时(T3)及拔管时(T5),D组均低于N组,均有统计学差异(P<0.01);心率比较:入室后(T1)及手术结束时(T4)两组间均无统计学差异(P>0.05),气管插管时(T2)、切皮时(T3)、拔管时(T5)及离室时(T6),D组心率均低于N组,有显著统计学差异(P<0.05)。(3)术后D组不良事件发生少于N组。结论 :右美托咪啶负荷剂量0.8μg/kg,维持量0.4μg/kg,能够预防淋巴外科手术中气管插管反应,提高苏醒质量;但在拔管后仍需临床常规监护,防治心动过缓等不良事件的发生,保证患者安全。
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第5期815-818,共4页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1RIDNER SH, DIETRICH MS. Development and validation of the Lymphedema Symptom and Intensity Survey-Arm [J]. Support Care Cancer, 2015,23(10) : 3103-3112.
  • 2PASIN L, GRECO T, FELTRACCO P, et al. Dexmedetomidine as a sedative agent in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. PLoS One, 2013,8(12) :e82913.
  • 3GUPTA S, SINGH D, SOOD D, et al. Role of dexmedetomidine in early extubation of the intensive care unit patients [J]. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2015,31 ( 1 ) : 92-98.
  • 4XIA ZQ, CHEN SQ, YAO X, et al. Clinical benefits of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in adult intensive care unit patients: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials [J]. J Surg Res, 2013,185(2) :833-843.
  • 5KOZIRM J, MAO L, ARORA A, et at. Inhibition of glutamatergic activation of extracellular Signal-regulated protein kinases in- hippocampal neurons by the intravenous anesthetic propofol [J]. Anesthesiology, 2006,105 (6) : 1182-1191.
  • 6HIRONO M, NAGAO S, OBATA K. Developmental α2-adrener- gic regulation of noradrenergic synaptic facilitation at cerebellar GABAergic synapses [J]. Neuroseience, 2014,256 : 242-251.
  • 7VOLKOV PA, CHURADZE BT, SEVALKIN SA, et al. DEXMEDETOMIDINE--THEORY OR EXPERIENCE? [J] Anesteziol Reanimatol, 2015,60 (2) : 68-71.
  • 8ARAIN SR, EBERT TJ. The efficacy, side effets, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for Intraoperative sedation [J]. Anesth Analg, 2002,95 (2) :461- 466.
  • 9AFONSO J, REIS F. Dexmedetomidine: current role in anesthesia and intensive care [J]. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2012,62 (1): 118-133.
  • 10AKEJU O, PAVONE KJ, WESTOVER MB, et al. A comparison of propofol- and dexmedetomidine-induced electroencephalogram dynamics using spectral and coherence analysis [ J ]. Anesthesiology. 2014.121(5) :978-989.

二级参考文献51

共引文献320

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部