摘要
目的探讨危急重症患者使用急诊呼吸阶梯性治疗的临床疗效。方法随机抽取我院2013年5月～2014年4月收治的100例危急重症患者作为研究对象,随机分成对照组和观察组,每组50例,对照组采取传统呼吸支持抢救方法治疗,观察组采取急诊呼吸阶梯性治疗,比较分析两组患者呼吸支持方式、呼吸复苏率、呼吸稳定所需时长等差异。结果观察组和对照组呼吸支持方式比例前3位的相同,分别为呼吸机支持、复苏体位、鼻导管给氧;观察组复苏体位和气管扩切术例数多于对照组;观察组呼吸复苏率高于对照组,呼吸稳定所需时长显著短于对照组。结论危急重症患者使用急诊呼吸阶梯性治疗的临床疗效较好。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of emergency treatment for severe acute respiratory disease. Methods Selected 100 cases of critical patients from May 2013 to April 2014 in our hospital, which were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, 50 cases in each group. The control group was treated with traditional respiratory support. The observation group was treated with emergency respiratory ladder. The difference of respiratory support, respiratory recovery, respiratory stability was analyzed in the two groups. Results The observation group and the control group respiratory support mode was the same as those in the 3 patients. the observation group respiratory recovery was higher than the control group. Conclusion The clinical effect of emergency treatment of emergency treatment for critical patients with severe critical illness is better.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2016年第4期92-93,共2页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
危急重症
急诊呼吸阶梯性治疗
临床分析
Critical and severe
Emergency treatment
Berathe stepwise respiratory
Clinical analysis
