多模态文体学对电影场景的解读被引量：4

A Multimodal Stylistic Approach towards Film Interpretation

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要作为声、光、色等多种模态的集合体,电影的解读一直是艺术批评领域关注重点;然而,传统意义上的电影赏析多见直觉印象式评述,缺乏必要的文本证据。基于电影多模态语篇分析现状,本文从文体学视角,结合电影形式学分析框架以及基视觉语法框架,提出"系统化分类-形式化分析"的多模态文体学研究模式,并将其应用于电影《喜福会》中两个场景的阐释。研究发现,电影音频和视频中的多模态元素以一种互动关联的方式,引导观众将其对女儿的同理心和同情感转移至母亲。 As a multimodal integration of sound, light and color, film has always been the focus of art criticism. In its traditional sense, film interpretation has been concerned mostly with the intuitive impressions critics have left while watching a film, without much concrete textual evidence to support. Drawing upon works from the field of multimodal studies, this paper adopts a stylistic perspective by combining the formalistic study of film by BordweU ＆ Thompson （2.001） and Kress ＆ van Leeuwen＇ s （2006） visual-grammar framework. As an illustration, the paper analyses two consecutive scenes from the film The Joy Luck Club, involving mother-and-daughter conflicts. The analysis has shown that the multimodal elements in the two scenes are arranged in a way that the audience changed from sympathizing with the daughter to sym- pathizing with the mother. This attitudinal process has never been pointed out by previous studies on the interpretation of the film.

作者荣榕

机构地区华南理工大学外国语学院

出处《山东外语教学》 2015年第4期15-24,共10页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching

基金国家社科基金项目"历史主义视角下的新文学伦理学批评研究"(项目编号:14BWW003) 教育部社科基金项目"叙事语篇‘视角’的认知诗学研究"(项目编号:13YJA740082)的部分成果

关键词多模态文体学分析电影多模态分析电影解读视觉语法《喜福会》 stylistic analysis of multimodal texts multimodal analysis of film film interpretation visual grammar The Joy Luck Club

分类号 H052 [语言文字—语言学]

作者简介荣榕（1983-），女，汉族，重庆人，讲师。研究方向：文体学、话语分析、多模态语篇分析。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献35

1Barthes, R. Elements ofSemiology[M]. M. Ward & R. Haward Trans. London: Jonathan Cape, 1968.
2Barthes, R. Image-Music-Text[M]. London: Fontana, 1977.
3Bordwell, D. & K. Thompson. Film Art: An Introduction (6th ed. ) [ M]. New York: The McGraw - Hill Com- panies, 2001.
4Brown, P. & S. Levinson. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1987.
5Camras, L. A, et al. Direct choice by children and adults: Affect, situation and linguistic politeness [ J ]. Mer- rill - Palmer Quarterly, 1985, (31) : 19 - 31.
6Culpeper, J. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness [ J ]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1996, ( 25 ) : 349 - 367.
7Culpeper, J. Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts[ M]. Harlow: Longman, 2001.
8Culpeper, J. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The weakest link [ J ]. Journal of Po- liteness Research, 2005, ( 1 ) :35 -72.
9Griee, P. Logic and conversation[A]. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.). Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts[C]. New York: Academic Press, 1975.41 -58.
10Katz, E. The Film Encyclopaedia (3rd ed. )[M]. New York: Harper Perennial, 1998.