利益分化社会中的协商民主及其有效性问题被引量：5

Deliberative Democracy and Its Effectiveness in the Interest-differed Society

导出

摘要现代社会因地域、阶层及族群身份等界限带来的利益分化和矛盾冲突日渐凸显。传统的民主实践模式并不能从根本上很好地解决利益分化社会的包容性与有效治理问题,而协商民主为断裂社会中实现长久的持续稳定提供了一个好的路径,它既保障了包容性,又保障了各个主体间的有机关联。协商民主的有效性也必须要解决信息、程序和利益三者间的有机联系问题,其实践形态需要满足制度化和开放性的双重属性。 It is increasingly prominent that more and more conflicts of interests have been a- roused in modem society by geographical, social and ethnic identity. With regard to the traditional democratic practice mode which can not fundamentally settle the challenge of inclusiveness and ef- fectiveness of this interest-differed society, deliberative democracy has done a service to long lasting stability by ensuring the inclusiveness as well as the organic connection between each main body. But the effectiveness of deliberative democracy must also address information, programs and interests between each part, and the practical form need to aim at both institutionalization and openness.

作者吴兴智

机构地区中共浙江省委党校科学发展观与浙江发展研究中心

出处《南京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第7期69-76,共8页 Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

关键词利益分化协商民主包容性有效性 interest-differed deliberative democracy inclusiveness effectiveness

分类号 D082 [政治法律—政治学]

作者简介吴兴智，中共浙江省委党校科学发展观与浙江发展研究中心副教授、博士

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1Donald L. Horowitz. Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
2Adam Przeworski. Democracy and the Market. Political and Eco- nomic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America 23 - 24 ( 1991 ).
3Donald L. Horowitz. The Cracked Foundations of the Right to Secede. J. Dem. , Apr, 2003, p.515.
4[古希腊]修昔底德.《伯罗奔尼撒战争史》(上),商务印书馆2004年版,第150页.
5Adeno Addis. Deliberative Democracy in Severely Fractured So- cieties. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Vol, 16, Winter 2009. pp. 59 - 83.
6Jorge M. Valadez. Deliberative Democracy, Political Legitima- cy, and Self Democracy in Muhicultural Societies. USA West- view Press, 2001, p. 30.
7Yamini Aiyar. Invited Spaces, Invited Participation. Effects of Greater Participation on Accountability in Service Delivery. India Review, vol. 9, no. 2, April - June, 2010, pp. 204-229.
8Anne Marie Goetz and Rob Jenkins. Hybrid Forms of Accounta- bility. Citizen Engagement in Institutions of Public Oversight in India. Public Management Review. Vol, 3, No, 3, 2001, pp. 363 - 384.
9宁有才.公共利益界定的协商民主视角分析[J].北京行政学院学报,2013(5):44-47. 被引量：3
10Yamini Aiyar. Invited Spaces, Invited Participation. Effects of Greater Participation on Accountability in Service Delivery. India Review, vol. 9, no. 2, April-June, 2010, pp.204-229.