摘要
就南海U型线的法律地位而言,存在着"海上疆域线"说、"岛屿归属线"说、"历史性海域线"说、"历史性权利线"说,这些观点各有不足。从领土取得的习惯国际法和条约来看,南海诸岛为我国固有领土;从海洋法规则来看,我国已经形成了南海海域的历史性权利。因而,南海U型线应具有双重性质的法律地位,即岛屿归属线和海洋历史性权利线。
On the legal status of U-shape line in the South China Sea, there are four theories：＂maritime boundary line＂ theory, ＂ the islands belonging line＂ theory, ＂ historic waters area line＂theory and ＂historical title line＂ theory which have their own shortcomings. From the territory of thecustomary international law and treaties, the islands in the South China Sea are China＇s inherentterritory. From the law of the sea, China has formed the historic titles in South China sea. Thus,legal status of U-shape line in the South China Sea should have a dual natures of legal status. It is thethe islands belonging to line and the historic titles line.
出处
《河北科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2015年第2期52-57,共6页
Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences
基金
"中西部高校综合实力提升工程"法学重点学科建设项目
关键词
南海U型线
领土主权
历史性权利
法律地位
U-shape line in the South China Sea
territorial sovereignty
historical title
legal status
作者简介
余贺伟（1980-），男，河南上蔡人，河南司法警官职业学院法律系讲师，厦门大学法学院2014级国际法专业博士研究生，主要从事国际法、人权法研究。
