期刊文献+

基于S型曲线的指标权重确定方法 被引量:4

Method to Determine Index Weight Based on S Curve
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对动态系统的多指标多决策者综合评价问题,目前的赋权法很少考虑决策者评价可信度及指标权重随评价对象变化而变化的情况,因此提出一种基于置信度的参数可调的S型曲线指标赋权模型。在专家打分法的基础上,通过引入专家权威性和差异性系数来确定专家置信度,提高专家评价的可信度,运用可调参数来校准基于置信度的指标赋权模型,使其能较好地解决评价者与动态系统中指标权重之间的非线性关系,增加了赋权模型的灵活性。结合实例确定指标权重的结果符合客观实际,验证了此方法的可行性和实用性,它为确定指标权重提供了一种新的有效途径。 Aiming at the problem of comprehensive evaluation of multiple decision makers and multi index for dynamic system, the current weighting methods seldom consider the credibility of the decision-makers and the change of target weight with the variation of the evaluation object. A parameter weighting model based on confidence adjustable type S curve index was proposed. Based on the expert scoring method, through introducing expert authority and difference co- efficient of experts to determine expert confidence, it enhances the credibility of expert evaluation. An adjustable para- meter is used to calibrate the weighting model based on the confidence index, which can solve the non-linear relation be- tween the evaluation index weight and the dynamic system and increase the flexibility of the weighting model. Combi- ning the results to determine the index weight in accord with the objective reality, it verified the feasibility and practica- bility of this method, provided a new method for determining the index weight.
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期216-219,227,共5页 Computer Science
关键词 专家权威性 专家置信度 参数可调 S型曲线赋权 Authority of expert Expert confidence Adjustable parameters S curve of empowerment
作者简介 何逢(1989-),男,硕士生,主要研究方向为网络与分布计算,E-mail:18500942252@163.com 燕雪峰(1975-),男,副教授,主要研究方向为计算机网络、分布交互仿真等; 周勇(1975-),男,副教授,主要研究方向为人工智能、专家系统等。
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献40

共引文献134

同被引文献50

  • 1乌云娜,刘芳.工程项目管理前期规划中WBS的应用[J].建筑经济,2006,27(S2):110-112. 被引量:12
  • 2Purba J H, Lu J, Zhang G, et al. A fuzzy reliability assessment of basic events of fault trees through qualitative data process- ing[J]. Fuzzy Sets & Systems,2014,243:50-69.
  • 3Huang H Z,Tong X,Zuo M J. Posbist fault tree analysis of co- herent syatems [ J ]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2004,84(2) :141-148.
  • 4Purba J H. Fuzzy probability on reliability study of nuclear power plant probabilistic safety assessment: a review [ J ]. Pro- gress in Nuclear Energy ,2014,76:73-80.
  • 5Hsu H M, Chen T C. Aggregation of fuzzy opinion under group decision making[ J ]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1994,79:279- 285.
  • 6Miri Lavasani S M ,Yang Z, Finlay J, et al. Fuzzy risk assess- ment of oil and gas offshore wells[ J]. Process Safety and En- vironmental Protection,2011,89:277-294.
  • 7An M. Risk assessment in railway safety management[ J]. In- ternational Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2007,14 : 45 -56.
  • 8PiUay A,Wang J. A risk ranking approach incorporating fuzzy set theory and grey theory[ J ]. Engineering Reliability & Sys- tem Safety ,2003,79( 1 ) :61-67.
  • 9Wang D, Zhang P, Chen L. Fuzzy fault tree analysis for fire and explosion of crude oil tanks [ J ]. Journal of Loss Preven- tion in the Process Industries,2013,26 (6) : 1390-1398.
  • 10Chen S. A new similarity measure of generalized fuzzy numbers based on geometric - mean averaging operator [ C ]//Proc of IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems. Vancouver, BC,Canada:Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. ,2006 : 1879-1886.

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部