期刊文献+

Full ranking procedure based on best and worst frontiers 被引量:5

Full ranking procedure based on best and worst frontiers
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 In the traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) structure, the efficiency score for one decision making unit (DMU) is calculated by measuring the distance of the evaluated DMU to the best practice frontier. Recent researches have provided the reasonability of considering the worst practice frontier as a supple- ment to the traditional DEA techniques. The existing researches take only one type of frontier into account, and they cannot com- pare the evaluated DMU with both the best and the worst perform- ing DMUs. A DEA-based procedure is developed to consider the best and the worst frontiers in the same scenario where the ratio of two distances (RDS) measure is proposed. The principal appli- cation of this approach is for ranking, and, as a complement tool, for performance evaluation. The proposed approach can be used in a wide range of applications such as the performance evaluation of employees and others. Finally, a bookstore data set is used to illustrate the proposed approach. In the traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) structure, the efficiency score for one decision making unit (DMU) is calculated by measuring the distance of the evaluated DMU to the best practice frontier. Recent researches have provided the reasonability of considering the worst practice frontier as a supple- ment to the traditional DEA techniques. The existing researches take only one type of frontier into account, and they cannot com- pare the evaluated DMU with both the best and the worst perform- ing DMUs. A DEA-based procedure is developed to consider the best and the worst frontiers in the same scenario where the ratio of two distances (RDS) measure is proposed. The principal appli- cation of this approach is for ranking, and, as a complement tool, for performance evaluation. The proposed approach can be used in a wide range of applications such as the performance evaluation of employees and others. Finally, a bookstore data set is used to illustrate the proposed approach.
机构地区 School of Management
出处 《Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics》 SCIE EI CSCD 2015年第3期514-522,共9页 系统工程与电子技术(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(71121061 71271195 71322101) the National Social Science Fund of China(13CTQ042) the USTC Foundation for Innovative Research Team(WK2040160008)
关键词 data envelopment analysis (DEA) RANKING best frontier worst frontier. data envelopment analysis (DEA), ranking, best frontier, worst frontier.
作者简介 Yang Feng was born in 1977. He received his Ph.D. degree in management science and engineer- ing from University of Science and Technology of China in 2006. Afterwards, he worked in Schulich School of Business York University in Canada as a visiting scholar. He returned to University of Sci- ence and Technology of China in 2007. He is a professor in School of Management, University ofScience and Technology of China. He has published more than 30 ar- ticles in a wide range of international academic journals. His research interests include data envelopment analysis and multi-criteria decision modeling. E-mail: fengyang@ustc.edu.cnFei Du was born in 1987. She is a Ph.D. candidate in School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China. She has published several SCI or SSCI indexed articles in international aca- demic journals. Her research interests are data en- velopment analysis and supply chain management. E-mail: dufei @ mail.ustc.edu.cnLiang Liang was born in 1962. He received his Ph.D. degree in System Engineering from South- east University. He is a professor in School of Man- agement, University of Science and Technology of China. He is also the vice president of Hefei Uni- versity of technology, He is also a guest editor of International Journal of Mass Customization, and Asian-Pacific Business Reviews. He was the exec-utive Dean of School of Management University of Science and Technol- ogy of China from 2003 to 2013. He has published more than 100 articles in a wide range of international academic journals. His research interests include supply chain management and data envelopment analysis. E-mail: lliang@ustc.edu.cnLiuyi Ling was born in 1969. He obtained his Ph.D. degree in management science and engineering from University of Science and Technology of China in 2006. He is a lecturer in School of Management. University of Science and Technology of China. He has published more than 10 articles in a wide range of international academic journals. His research in- terests are supply chain management and decision modeling. E-mail: lyling@ustc.edu.cn
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, E. Rhodes. Measuring the effi- ciency of decision making units. European Journal of Oper- ation Research, 1978, 2(6): 429 - 444.
  • 2R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper. Some models for es- timating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 1984, 30(9): 1078-1092.
  • 3R. G. Dyson, R. Allen, A. S. Camanho, et al. Pitfalls and pro- tocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 132(2): 245-259.
  • 4F. Yang, L. Liang, G. Bi, et al. Ranking all decision making units based on their elementary difference. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 20(4): 732- 740.
  • 5E Yang, C. Yang, L. Ling, et al. A new approach to determine common weights in DEA efficiency evaluation model. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 21(4): 609- 615.
  • 6R. Mu, Z. Ma, C. Wei. Fuzzy data envelopment analysis ap- proach based on sample decision making units. Journal of Sys- tems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 23(3): 399- 407.
  • 7G. R. Jahanshahloo, M. Afzalinejad. A ranking method based on a full-inefficient frontier. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2006, 30(3): 248-260.
  • 8Y. M. Wang, J. B. Yang. Measuring the performances of decision-making units using interval efficiencies. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2007, 198( 1): 253 - 267.
  • 9H. Azizi, H. G. Ajirlu. Measurement of the worst practice of decision-making units in the presence of non-discretionary factors and imprecise data. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35(9): 4149-4156.
  • 10J. X. Chen. A comment on DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision making units. Applied Mathema- tics and Computation, 2012, 219(2): 583 -591.

同被引文献54

引证文献5

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部