期刊文献+

论我国知情同意权的缺陷——以“李丽云案”为视角 被引量:3

On the Defects of Informed Consent Right in China——From the perspective of "Li Liyun Case"
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 "李丽云案"中,因患者代理人对知情同意权的错误使用,导致了悲剧的发生。知情同意权所体现的,是患者的医疗自主权,而特定情况下,医疗自主权又存在一些局限:非自愿的自愿性、绝对的不容否认性以及形式与内容的矛盾性。这些局限性使得医疗自主权有可能被滥用;而造成权利滥用最直接的原因,则是自主权运行中权利与义务存在不对等性,以及公权力对自主权的运行规制不够。 In "Li Liyun Case", tragedy happened because of the patient's agent abused informed consent right. Informed consent right reflects the patient's medical autonomy right, but in some specific circumstances,there are some limitations to medical autonomy right: unwilling willingness, absolute undeniability, and the contradiction between form and content. These limitations make it possible for medical autonomy right to be abused, and the most direct reasons for the abuses are: the unequivalence of the rights and obligations in the operation of autonomy right, and the insufficient regulation of the public power in the operation of autonomy right.
作者 徐连英 宋庆
出处 《医学与法学》 2015年第2期21-24,共4页 Medicine and Jurisprudence
基金 2011年四川医事卫生法治研究中心立项项目"干预权与知情同意权滥用法律问题研究"(项目编号:YF11-Y05)的阶段性成果
关键词 知情同意权 医疗自主权 权利滥用 informed consent right medical autonomy right abuse of rights
作者简介 徐连英,哈尔滨医科大学人文学院教授,主要研究方向为医学人文精神、医事法学。 宋庆,哈尔滨医科大学人文学院2012级思想政治教育专业在读硕士研究生。
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献54

  • 1刘俊荣.关于知情同意的伦理与法律意义之辨析[J].医学与哲学,2005,26(09S):37-39. 被引量:17
  • 2Cohen & Cohen Little, Readings in Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy, Brown and Company.
  • 3See C B Macpherson, "The Meaning of Property", in Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions, University of Toronto Press, 1978.
  • 4Lawrence C Becker, Property Rights : Philosophical Foundations, London: Routledge and Kegan Pan1, 1997, pp. 8 - 11.
  • 5S J Stoljar: Analysis of Rights, The Macmillan Press Ltd., 1984, p. 75.p.4.
  • 6D D Raphael, Problems of Political Philosophy, London: Macmillan, 1970, pp. 68 -70.
  • 7Jaremy Bentham, "Supply Without Burthern," in W. Stark (ed.), Jererny Bentham' s Economic Writings, London, 1952, p.334.
  • 8Carl Friedrich, "Rights, liberties, freedoms: A Reappraisal", American Political Sciences Review, 57(1963), p.844.
  • 9H J McCloskey, "Moral Rights and Animals", Inquiry, 22(1979》.
  • 10Jeremy Waldron (ed.), Theories of Rights, Oxford University Press, 1984, "Introduction".pp. 3-4.pp.2-3.

共引文献248

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部