摘要
钟嵘在《诗品》中说刘桢诗“气过其文，雕润恨少”，是评未为允当。刘桢现存诗二十首，主要有味事、咏怀、咏物三种表现类型。其中咏怀表现带有浓重诗趣；咏事表现“简而确”，所以容易缺乏雕饰。但三种表现类型在一首诗里适当的安排，则显得彩色斑斓，颇有诗趣。由此可见，钟嵘的评论，失之偏颇。刘桢诗既有气格豪峻之阳刚美，也有“以敷其华，惊听回视”之高逸诗趣。
Zhong-rong indicated in the SHI PIN that the poems of Liu-zhen were lack of literary embellishments due to its excessive vigor. Through the analysis, it was discovered that his poetical style has a virile tendency, but on the other hand it was considerably embroidered and lyrical. The main result of this study showed that Zhong-rong's criticism on Liu-zhen's poem was biased in its virile style.
出处
《齐鲁学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2001年第4期5-8,共4页
Qilu Journal
关键词
刘桢
气格豪峻
高逸诗趣
雕饰美
Liu-zhen
literary embellishments
virile tendency
virile style.
