摘要
目的对胺碘酮治疗心律失常的临床治疗效果进行观察并分析。方法选取2014年我院收治的100例心律失常患者作为研究对象,将其随机分为对照组和观察组,每组各50例。对照组患者使用心律平进行治疗,观察组患者使用胺碘酮进行治疗。对两组患者的疗效进行观察对比。结果观察组患者的疗效优于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者均未出现严重的不良反应。结论与心律平相比,胺碘酮治疗心律失常的疗效更加显著。
ObjectiveTo observe and analyze the clinical effect of amiodarone in the treatment ofarrhythmia. Methods 100 cases of patients with arrhythmia were selected as the research object in 2014 in our hospital. The patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group,50 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were using propafenone while that of observation group were treated with amiodarone. Curative effect of two groups were compared after treatment. Results The curative effect of observation group was significantly better than that of control group（P〈0.05）. Serious adverse reactions were not found in the two groups of patients. Conclusion The effect of amiodarone in treatment of arrhythmia is better than propafenone.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2015年第13期116-117,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
胺碘酮
心律失常
疗效
Amiodarone
Arrhythmia
Curative effect
