期刊文献+

微创经皮肾镜穿刺取石术与开放手术治疗复杂肾结石的临床比较 被引量:4

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较微创经皮肾镜穿刺取石术与开放手术治疗复杂肾结石患者的临床效果。方法:将68例复杂肾结石患者分为对照组和研究组,每组各34例。对照组患者行开放手术治疗,研究组患者行微创经皮肾镜穿刺取石术治疗,对比分析两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果:研究组患者的结石清除率为91.2%,对照组患者的结石清除率为85.3%;两组患者并发症总发生率比较x2=12.6424,出血量、手术时间、下床活动时间、住院时间比较t=18.0374、5.5286、3.6254、4.4770,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论:微创经皮肾镜穿刺取石术治疗复杂肾结石患者的疗效优于开放手术治疗疗效。
作者 吴章林
出处 《中国民康医学》 2015年第10期45-47,共3页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1陈仕平,许恩赐,叶传忠.肾窦内肾盂加肾后下部联合切开治疗巨大鹿角形肾结石[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1995,16(10):594-596. 被引量:71
  • 2邓耀良.复杂性肾结石的外科治疗[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2006,21(2):81-84. 被引量:67
  • 3陈合群,廖锦堂,齐范,周炜,齐琳,陈湘,陈智勇,谢晋良,申鹏飞,张时纯.经皮肾镜取石术处理肾结石[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(6):374-376. 被引量:85
  • 4王图超,罗洪,李良成,胡志雄,郭贵华,杨胜邦,杨政旭,潘凯,姚明欣.复杂肾结石手术治疗体会(附340例报告)[J].医学信息(手术学分册),2007,20(5):418-420. 被引量:3
  • 5Gilvemet JM.New surgical concepts in nrnoving penal calculus.Urollnt,1965,20.255-257.
  • 6Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, de la Rosette JJ. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its legacy. Eur Uro1,2005,47 (1) :22 -28.
  • 7Wollin TA, Razvi HA, Denstedt JD. Identifying stone composition using infrared analysis of filtered urine after ureteroscopic lithotripsy. J Endourol, 1999, 13(7) :499 -503.
  • 8Rastinehad AR, Andonian S, Smith AD, et al. Management of hemorrhagic complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol,2009,23 (10) : 1763 - 1767.
  • 9吴阶平.吴阶平泌尿外科学[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2004.589-591.
  • 10Margel D,Lifshitz DA,Kugel V,et al.Percutaneous nephrolithotomy inpatients who previously underwent open nephrolithotomy[J].J Endourol,2005;19(10):1161-4.

共引文献45

同被引文献33

  • 1黄健,许可慰,郭正辉,林天歆,谢文练,韩金利,姚友生,黄海.斜卧位微创经皮肾镜取石术55例报告[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(1):15-18. 被引量:99
  • 2Pump B,Talleruphuus U,Christensen NJ,et al. Effects of supine,prone,and lateral positions on cardiovascular and renal variables inhumans[J]. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, 2002, 283(1):174-180.
  • 3Cheng Y. The application of loins- hard joint anesthesia in mini-mally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Modern PracticalMedicine, 2005, 17(12):765.
  • 4Shoma AM, Eeaky I, El-Kenawy MR, et al. Percutaneousnenephrolithotomy in the supine position: technical aspects andfunctional outcome compared with the prone technique[J]. Urolo-gy, 2002, 60(3):153-156.
  • 5He PS, Wu ZJ, Liu F, et al. The treatment experience of upperurinary tract stones with minimally invasive percutaneous nephros-tomy[J]. Contemporary Medicine, 2009, 15(31):68-69.
  • 6Valdivia Ufia JG, Valle J, Lopez JA, et a1. Technique and com-plications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 pa-tients in the supine position[J]. J Urol, 1998, 160(6 Pt 1):1975-1978.
  • 7Ng MT, Sun WH, Cheng CW, et a1. Supine position is safe andeffective for percutaneous nephmlilhotoy[J]. J Endourol, 2004,18(5):469-478.
  • 8Gofrit ON, Shapiro A, Donchin Y, et al. Lateral decubitus posi-tion for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in themorbidly obeseorkyphoticpatient[J]. J Endourol, 2002, 16(6):383-386.
  • 9Manohar T, Jain P, Desai M. Supine percutaneous nephrolithoto-my: Effective approach to high - risk and morbidy obese patients[J]. J Endouro l, 2007, 21(1):44-49.
  • 10Neto EA, Mitre AI, Gomes CM, et al. Percutaneous nephrolitho-tripsy with the patient in a modified supine position[J]. J Urol,2007, 178(1):165-168.

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部