期刊文献+

基于代理管理锚点的PMIPv6切换性能优化分析

Performance optimization analysis of PMIPv6 handoff based on proxy management anchor point
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 代理移动IPv6中,由于移动节点在移动接入网关(MAG)间切换时,新的MAG都必须与本地移动锚点(LMA)进行注册,导致较高的切换开销。为减少这种开销,引入了代理管理锚点(PMAP),每个PMAP管理由多个MAG子网所构成的域,这样当移动节点在PMAP域内的MAG子网间切换时,MAG只需要与距离较近的PMAP进行切换信令的交互;只有在PMAP域间切换时,才需要MAG与PMAP,以及PMAP与LMA之间的切换信令的交互,避免了一次会话过程中移动节点在MAG子网之间切换时MAG与LMA的频繁切换信令交互的开销。模型和数值分析的结果表明:与PMIPv6方案比较,PMAP-PMIPv6方案的平均切换开销小,域内的切换时延低,一次会话的平均丢包数也少,在一定程度上优化了网络性能。 In proxy mobile IPv6,when the mobile node takes handoff between Mobile Access Gateways (MAG),the new MAG must be registered to the local mobile anchor,which resulting in higher handoff costs. To reduce this cost,the Proxy Management Anchor Point (PMAP)is introduced.Each PMAP manages one do-main composed of a group of MAG subnets,so that when the handoff happens between MAGs within the same PMAG domain MAG needs to register to the shorter distance PMAP.When the handoff is between the PMAP domains,MAG must be registered to LMA through PMAP.This model avoids the frequent registration from MAG to LMA as the mobile node moves across the MAG subnet.Compared with PMIPv6 scheme,numerical a-nalysis results show that the PMAP-PMIPv6 scheme has low handoff cost,low intra-PMAP handoff latency,and low average packet loss for one session.That,in part,improves the network performance.
出处 《桂林理工大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第1期192-197,共6页 Journal of Guilin University of Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(61262076) 广西自然科学基金项目(2012GXNSFBA053172)
关键词 代理移动IPV6 代理管理锚点 分析模型 切换开销 proxy management anchor point analysis model handoff cost
作者简介 葛云生(1964-),男,硕士,副研究员,计算机科学与技术专业,yshge@glut.edu.cn
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1Johnson D, Perkins C, Arkko J. IETF RFC 3775 Mobility Sup- port in IPv6[S]. 2003.
  • 2Gundavelli S, Leung K, Devarapalli V, et al. IETF RFC 5213 Proxy Mobile IPv6[S]. 2008.
  • 3Giaretta G. IETF draft-ieff-netlmm-mip-interactions-07 Interac- tions between PMIPv6 and MIPv6 t Scenarios and related issues [S]. 2010.
  • 4Lee K-W, Seo W-K, Kum D-W, et al. Global Mobility Manage- ment Scheme with Interworking between PMIPv6 and MIPv6 [C]// IEEE International ConSerenee on Wireless & Mobile Computing, Networking & Communication. Avignon, France, 2008:153-158.
  • 5Yah Z-W, Zhou H-C, Wang H-C, et al. Design and implementa- tion of a hybrid MIPv6/PMIPv6-based mobility management ar- chitecture[JJ. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 2011, 53(3/4):421-442.
  • 6Koodli R. IETF RFC 5568[S]. Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers. 2009.
  • 7Yokota H,Chowdhury K,Koodli R, et al. IETF RFC 5949[S]. Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6,2010.
  • 8Haberman B, Hinden R. IETF RFC 5175[S]. IPv6 Router Ad- vertisement Flags Option, 2008.
  • 9Makaya C,Pierre S. An Analytical Framework for Performance Evaluation of IPv6-Based Mobility Management Protocols[J].IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2008, 7 (3): 972-983.
  • 10Sooyeol R, Misum K, Mun Y-S. Enhanced Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6[C]//2009 International Conference on Com- putational Science and Its Applications. Yongin, 2009 : 39-43.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部